Federal contractor · FAIRFAX, VA

MANDEX INC

MANDEX INC received $14.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 9 awards (−27% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $226.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($14.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$14.8M
New awards
9
Sole-source
1.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
VKM2EJNZJ367
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 14.4MFY2017
  2. 31.8MFY2018
  3. 23.1MFY2019
  4. 26.1MFY2020
  5. 26.6MFY2021
  6. 29MFY2022
  7. 19.8MFY2023
  8. 20.5MFY2024
  9. 20.4MFY2025
  10. 14.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$14.9M100%
    5 awards
  2. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards
  3. Defense Logistics Agency$00.0%
    1 awards
  4. Defense Contract Management Agency-$95.5K0.0%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$14.9M99%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$147.7K1.0%
  3. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Fairfax County, VA$14.7M99%
  2. Bay County, FL$147.7K1.0%
  3. Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition1.0%
    US 39% · $147.7K
  • Sole-source awards1.0%
    US 30% · $147.7K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Navy$147.7K
    Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. MANAGEMENT, SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, FINANCE, LOGISTICS, AND QUALITY ASSURANCE SERVICES TO DDHA INFRASTRUCTURE & OPERATIONS AND A TRIENNIAL TECHNICAL REFRESH OF THE MTF INFRASTRUCTURE AT 130 MILITARY TREATMENT FACILITIES WORLDWIDE.$50.6M
    Department of the Navy· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Dec 6, 2023 – Jun 2, 2026· N6523624F3007
  2. GLOBAL COMMAND AND CONTROL SYSTEM - TACTICAL COMBAT OPERATIONS (GCCS TCO)/ JOINT TACTICAL COP WORKSTATION (JTCW) ENGINEERING SUPPORT$28.4M
    Department of the Navy· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Mar 14, 2018 – Mar 17, 2026· N6523618F3050
  3. DCGS-MC GEOSPATIAL AND ALL-SOURCE INTELLIGENCE ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES$15.7M
    Defense Contract Management Agency· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· Mar 25, 2019 – May 12, 2026· N6523619F3044
  4. INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC SECURITY SYSTEM (IESS) SUSTAINMENT AT US NAVY SITES LOCATED IN THE CONTIGUOUS UNITED STATES (CONUS)$12.8M
    Defense Contract Management Agency· Fairfax County, VA· Equipment maintenance· Nov 19, 2019 – Mar 16, 2026· N6523620F3003
  5. 8509749219!PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE ON I$339.5K
    Defense Logistics Agency· Duval County, FL· Equipment maintenance· Mar 10, 2023 – Dec 11, 2025· SP330023P0410
  6. INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC SECURITY SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT, AUTOMATED ELECTRONIC CONTROL SYSTEMS, INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM, VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM AND SOFTWARE UPGRADES FOR BUILDING ACCESS AND SECURITY.$113K
    Department of the Navy· Bay County, FL· Other equipment & supplies· Feb 10, 2026 – Apr 30, 2026· N6133126F0021
  7. PROJECT: TITAN FOR INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC SECURITY SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT, AUTOMATED ELECTRONIC CONTROL SYSTEMS, INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM, VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM AND SOFTWARE UPGRADES FOR BUILDING ACCESS AND SECURITY.$77.5K
    Department of the Navy· Bay County, FL· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 22, 2025 – Mar 3, 2026· N6133125F0149
  8. INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC SECURITY SYSTEM SUSTAINMENT, AUTOMATED ELECTRONIC CONTROL SYSTEMS, INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM, VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM AND SOFTWARE UPGRADES FOR BUILDING ACCESS AND SECURITY.$34.7K
    Department of the Navy· Bay County, FL· Other equipment & supplies· Oct 6, 2025 – Mar 18, 2026· N6133126F0001

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $6.2M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $3.4M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.8M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · -$87.9K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

8 companies · $11.4M reported

  1. PEOPLETEC, INC.$5.6M
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 1 subaward · Communications equipment manufacturing
  2. CHEROKEE NATION MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING, L.L.C..$3.8M
    TULSA, OK · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. GEORGIA TECH APPLIED RESEARCH CORP$1M
    ATLANTA, GA · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 6 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. M.T.G. SERVICES, INC.$50.2M−31% in FY2026
    LAKEHURST, NJ · 90% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. EMCUBE INC$58.1M+14% in FY2026
    ARLINGTON, VA · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesDefense Contract Management Agency · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. CH2M HILL CLARK NEXSEN ENERGY PARTNERS JV$52.9M−100% in FY2026
    GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.