Federal contractor · MESA, AZ

MANNS CLEAN UP SERVICE, INC.

MANNS CLEAN UP SERVICE, INC. received $150.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+9.9% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.8M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($150.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$150.1K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
KWLGFJAM3BL7
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 286.9KFY2017
  2. 48.9KFY2018
  3. 321.6KFY2019
  4. 274.4KFY2020
  5. 72.7KFY2021
  6. 357.7KFY2022
  7. 117.3KFY2023
  8. 136.6KFY2025
  9. 150.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Forest Service$150.1K100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$150.1K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Pueblo County, CO$64.8K43%
  2. Sevier County, UT$45.7K30%
  3. Coconino County, AZ$39.6K26%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $150.1K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $150.1K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. MANNS CLEAN UP SERVICE, INC. COPSF001153 E2062$64.8K
    Forest Service· Pueblo County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Jul 23, 2026 – Jul 23, 2026· 1202SB26M1940
  2. MANNS CLEAN UP SERVICE, INC. UTFIF260198 E331$45.7K
    Forest Service· Sevier County, UT· Facilities & utilities· Jul 9, 2026 – Jul 9, 2026· 1202SB26M1085
  3. MANNS CLEAN UP SERVICE, INC. AZCOF000781 E313$39.6K
    Forest Service· Coconino County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Jul 5, 2026 – Jul 5, 2026· 1202SB26M1007

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. KISER & KISER LLC$296K+117% in FY2026
    PRINEVILLE, OR · 99.5% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry
  2. GOF LLC$295.4K−10% in FY2026
    AMMON, ID · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry
  3. COYOTE ROCK WILDLAND LLC$307.2K−7.8% in FY2026
    LA PINE, OR · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryBureau of Land Management · Support activities for forestry

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.