Federal contractor · SEATTLE, WA

MANSON/CONNOLLY SEAL BEACH JV

MANSON/CONNOLLY SEAL BEACH JV received $1.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (+1.1% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $163.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($1.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.7M
New awards
1
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
JG9XMEU6FC73
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 88.1MFY2019
  2. 66.5MFY2020
  3. 975.2KFY2021
  4. 1.3MFY2022
  5. -1.3MFY2023
  6. 4.9MFY2024
  7. 1.6MFY2025
  8. 1.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$1.7M100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$1.7M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Orange County, CA$1.7M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. DESIGN-BID-BUILD CONSTRUCTION PROJECT FOR P-224 CAUSEWAY, BOAT CHANNEL, AND TURNING BASIN AND OPTIONAL ITEM P-226 AMMUNITION PIER TO SUPPORT THE NAVAL ORDNANCE FUNCTIONS AT NAVAL WEAPONS STATION, SEAL BEACH, CA.$163.9M
    Department of the Navy· Orange County, CA· Construction & real property· Jul 15, 2019 – Mar 2, 2026· N6247319C2450

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $90.5M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $54.1M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2023: $571.8K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $2.7M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $240.8K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

42 companies · $148M reported

  1. APAC-MISSISSIPPI, INC.$40M
    RICHLAND, MS · 11 subawards · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  2. CMC REBAR WEST$33.7M
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 12 subawards · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  3. GREEN MOUNTAIN CORPORATION$16.1M
    COMPTON, CA · 23 subawards · Other heavy and civil engineering construction

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. W. F. MAGANN CORP$7.2M+13,701% in FY2026
    PORTSMOUTH, VA · 88% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  2. H2O GUAM JV$6.8M−100% in FY2026
    AIEA, HI · 83% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  3. MARATHON CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION$10.1M−90% in FY2026
    LAKESIDE, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.