Federal contractor · LAYTON, UT
MARK G. MILLER, INC
MARK G. MILLER, INC received $2.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−46% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $25M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($1.6M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $2.2M
- New awards
- 5
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 84%
- UEI
- JCJVMV9BD1T1
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 1.4MFY2017
- 2.6MFY2018
- 2.5MFY2019
- 1.9MFY2020
- 877.5KFY2021
- 2.3MFY2022
- 4.6MFY2023
- 2.8MFY2024
- 4MFY2025
- 2.2MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Air Force$1.6M74%2 awards
- Department of the Army$414.4K19%2 awards
- Defense Logistics Agency$150.8K6.9%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Professional services$1.6M74%
- Research & development$414.4K19%
- Other equipment & supplies$150.8K6.9%
Where the work was performed
- Davis County, UT$2M91%
- Fayette County, PA$200K9.2%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition84%US 39% · $1.8M
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions84%US 8.7% · $1.8M
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- ESSR FRBP SLEP$9.4MDepartment of the Air Force· Davis County, UT· Professional services· May 17, 2022 – May 20, 2026· FA821422C0005
- Department of the Air Force· Davis County, UT· Other equipment & supplies· Sep 14, 2023 – Feb 23, 2026· FA820623C0023
- Department of the Army· Davis County, UT· Research & development· May 29, 2025 – Dec 19, 2025· W9132T25C0008
- Department of the Army· Fayette County, PA· Research & development· Apr 23, 2026 – Apr 23, 2026· W912HQ26CA034
- Defense Logistics Agency· Davis County, UT· Other equipment & supplies· Dec 16, 2025 – Jan 27, 2026· SPE8E526CF005
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $0 paid out · $72K received
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $602.3K received
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.3M received
- FY2024: $0 paid out · $768.2K received
- FY2025: $0 paid out · $747.1K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
6 companies · $3.5M reported
- CH2M HILL, INC$2.4MENGLEWOOD, CO · 4 subawards · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- ENGLEWOOD, CO · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
- CALL HENRY INC$174.7KTITUSVILLE, FL · 1 subaward · Facilities support services
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- PROMETHEUS HYDROGEN, LLC$7.1M−100% in FY2026SAINT CHARLES, IL · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- S4-SDC-JV LLC$6.7M−145% in FY2026BEDFORD, MA · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- AEROCORE TECHNOLOGIES LLC$6.6M+607% in FY2026LEBANON, IN · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.