Federal contractor · TUCSON, AZ

MARSH DEVELOPMENT, INC.

MARSH DEVELOPMENT, INC. received $475.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+4,421% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $65.2M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Land Management ($407.9K).

Obligations · FY2026
$475.9K
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
R3TLEM22DY32
Small businessWoman-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 10MFY2017
  2. 16MFY2018
  3. 5.4MFY2019
  4. 6.5MFY2020
  5. 4.9MFY2021
  6. 13.6MFY2022
  7. 5.5MFY2023
  8. 2.7MFY2024
  9. 10.5KFY2025
  10. 475.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$475.9K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Cochise County, AZ· Construction & real property· Sep 26, 2023 – May 19, 2026· W9124A23C0009
  2. Department of the Air Force· Pima County, AZ· Equipment maintenance· Sep 27, 2024 – Mar 16, 2026· FA487724C0037
  3. Bureau of Land Management· Graham County, AZ· Construction & real property· Jun 5, 2026 – Sep 23, 2026· 140L0626C0009

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NC JV LLC$3.1M+322% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
  2. ADANA, TUR · 65% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
  3. SAPPORO, JPN · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionAir Force · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.