Federal contractor · LINDEN, NC
MARTIN EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES INC.
MARTIN EDWARDS & ASSOCIATES INC. received $545.7K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−52% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $13.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($285.2K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $545.7K
- New awards
- 5
- Sole-source
- 18%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- JSLXZCJTDG96
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 1.6MFY2017
- 2.3MFY2018
- 2MFY2019
- 1.6MFY2020
- 1.3MFY2021
- 1.3MFY2022
- 1.3MFY2023
- 339.6KFY2024
- 1.1MFY2025
- 545.7KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Navy$285.2K52%2 awards
- Department of the Air Force$260.6K48%3 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Equipment maintenance$545.7K100%
Where the work was performed
- Beaufort County, SC$186K34%
- Charleston County, SC$125.8K23%
- Taylor County, TX$117.7K22%
- Escambia County, FL$99.2K18%
- Okaloosa County, FL$17K3.1%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition18%US 39% · $99.2K
- Sole-source awards18%US 30% · $99.2K
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications18%US 5.1% · $99.2K
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Navy· Beaufort County, SC· Equipment maintenance· May 30, 2023 – Jun 11, 2026· M0026323P0025
- Department of the Air Force· Charleston County, SC· Equipment maintenance· Dec 15, 2021 – Dec 5, 2025· FA441822C0009
- Department of the Air Force· Taylor County, TX· Equipment maintenance· Feb 24, 2025 – Feb 18, 2026· FA466125P0025
- Department of the Navy· Escambia County, FL· Equipment maintenance· Jul 28, 2025 – Feb 6, 2026· N6883625PS067
- Department of the Air Force· Okaloosa County, FL· Equipment maintenance· Feb 3, 2023 – Feb 6, 2026· FA282323P0015
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- EXCALIBUR LAUNDRIES, INC.$2.2M+29% in FY2026PRAIRIE DU CHIEN, WI · 62% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Consumer goods rentalNavy · Consumer goods rental
- PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT CORP$1.9M−21% in FY2026IXONIA, WI · 52% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Consumer goods rental
- BBE SALES & LEASING, INC.$1.2M−71% in FY2026OAKTON, VA · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Consumer goods rental
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.