Federal contractor · MOUNT AIRY, MD

MATRIX SOLUTIONS INC

MATRIX SOLUTIONS INC received $23.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−91% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $2.6M. Its largest customer was Drug Enforcement Administration ($22.7K).

Obligations · FY2026
$23.3K
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
2.6%
UEI
WQCFF24K6LT1
Small businessWoman-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 658.4KFY2017
  2. 346.2KFY2018
  3. 180.7KFY2019
  4. 318.7KFY2020
  5. 332.5KFY2021
  6. 313.8KFY2022
  7. 27.8KFY2023
  8. 141.6KFY2024
  9. 248.1KFY2025
  10. 23.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Drug Enforcement Administration$22.7K97%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Navy$6112.6%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$22.7K97%
  2. Other equipment & supplies$6112.6%

Where the work was performed

  1. Frederick County, MD$22.7K97%
  2. Martin County, IN$6112.6%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition2.6%
    US 39% · $611
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions2.6%
    US 8.8% · $611
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. TITLE: DCIM TOOL DCTRACK (NLYTE REPLACEMENT) - LINE 5.01 REQUESTOR: TIMOTHY R FOUCHE ITJA#: TCITJA0015624 POP DATES: 11/01/2024 TO 10/31/2029$154.1K
    Drug Enforcement Administration· Frederick County, MD· IT & telecom· Oct 23, 2024 – Jan 15, 2026· 15DDHQ25F00000020
  2. REQUIRED TO PROVIDE READY OPERATIONAL ASSETS AND VERIFICATION OF ASSETS COMPLETED AFTER REPAIR LXNW 4523056792$611
    Department of the Navy· Martin County, IN· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 6, 2026 – Mar 6, 2026· N0016426FP440

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $843K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $280.4K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $195.7K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $396.8K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $38K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

6 companies · $1.8M reported

  1. PERATON ENTERPRISE SOLUTIONS LLC$1.5M
    CHANTILLY, VA · 16 subawards · Wired telecommunications carriers
  2. KBR SERVICES, LLC$102.3K
    HOUSTON, TX · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. TEKSYNAP CORPORATION$82.2K
    RESTON, VA · 1 subaward · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MANUFACTURING SYSTEM SERVICES, INC$364.6K−43% in FY2026
    CRESCENT SPRINGS, KY · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDrug Enforcement Administration · Computer systems design and related servicesVeterans Affairs · Computer systems design and related services
  2. INT80.IO, LLC$306.8K+220% in FY2026
    SCOTTSDALE, AZ · 37% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDrug Enforcement Administration · Computer systems design and related services
  3. JULIAHUB, INC.$176.6K
    CAMBRIDGE, MA · 30% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Computer systems design and related servicesNational Institutes of Health · Computer systems design and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.