Federal contractor · LA JOLLA, CA

MAXENTRIC TECHNOLOGIES LLC

No contract obligations recorded for MAXENTRIC TECHNOLOGIES LLC in FY2026. Since FY2019: $5.6M. Its largest customer was Office of Procurement Operations ($0).

Obligations · FY2026: $0
New awards: 1
Sole-source: —
Single offer: —

UEI: ZL9NF33GKUN3

Small business

Open in the contracts explorer Relationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the MAXENTRIC TECHNOLOGIES LLC company family: 2 registered entities, $789.8K in FY2026 together. See the family

MAXENTRIC TECHNOLOGIES LLCFORT LEE, NJ · Family page
AI name match · 92%$789.8K

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

150KFY2019
1.4MFY2020
0FY2021
496.8KFY2022
1.6MFY2023
1.2MFY2024
774KFY2025
0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

Office of Procurement Operations$00.0%
1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

THIS IS TO ESTABLISH A NEW CONTRACT FOR THE OATS REMOTE SPACE UNMANNED SYSTEM. FEDERAL SBIR PROGRAM, MANDATED BY 15 U.S.C. 638 RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT.$999.1K
Office of Procurement Operations· San Diego County, CA· Research & development· Sep 28, 2023 – May 27, 2026· 70RSAT23C00000058

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $5.6M reported

GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY$5.5M
FAIRFAX, VA · 7 subawards · Scientific research and development services
KBR SERVICES, LLC$65K
HOUSTON, TX · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 10 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

VADUM INC$19.6M−14% in FY2026
RALEIGH, NC · 71% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services+1 more
PHASE SENSITIVE INNOVATIONS INC$34.2M−40% in FY2026
NEWARK, DE · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services
VECTOR ATOMIC INC$34.4M−57% in FY2026
PLEASANTON, CA · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development servicesAir Force · Scientific research and development services+2 more

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of MAXENTRIC TECHNOLOGIES LLC (2 recipients).

Matched organizations

MaXentric TechnologiesAI match · 100%

Lobbying · 2023: $40K; 4 reports

Lobbying by year

2023$40K
4 reports

Top issues

Defense4 reports

Who was contacted

Navy - Dept of4 reports
U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES4 reports
U.S. SENATE4 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

Flagship Government Relations, Inc.$40K
4 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Congress: members and bills

Through the organizations matched to this company: members of Congress whose campaigns received contributions from their PACs, and the bills their lobbying reports named. Shown beside the company's contracts as a comparison, not a cause.

Bills named in its lobbying reports

H.R. 2670 · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 20241 report
118th Congress · Became law · 2023
H.R. 4365 · Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 20241 report
118th Congress · Passed one chamber · 2023
S. 2226 · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 20241 report
118th Congress · Passed one chamber · 2023
S. 2587 · Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 20241 report
118th Congress · Reported by committee · 2023

1 of 4 reports (2023) name at least one bill. Bills and resolutions the current reports name in their issue descriptions, by number of reports. A report names what it lobbied on, not which side it took.

Amounts, members and bills are as recorded, shown side by side. They say nothing about why a contribution was made, how a member voted or what a report sought. A bill number written in a report is read as the measure of the Congress its context points to (a law's number, the Congress written next to it, the title), else of the Congress then sitting.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.