Federal contractor · CIRCLE, MT

MC CONE COUNTY TREASURER

MC CONE COUNTY TREASURER received -$3,102 in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−108% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $288.6K. Its largest customer was Department of the Army (-$3,102). It also received $160.6K in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
-$3,102
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
HXFCK4ACQSH4
Other than small businessGovernment entity

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 29.5KFY2017
  2. 29.9KFY2018
  3. 31KFY2019
  4. 32.8KFY2020
  5. 27.6KFY2021
  6. 35.3KFY2022
  7. 35.1KFY2023
  8. 32.9KFY2024
  9. 37.7KFY2025
  10. -3.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Valley County, MT· Facilities & utilities· May 14, 2021 – Jun 11, 2026· W9128F21P0052

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

MC CONE COUNTY TREASURER received $160.6K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 1 actions (1 new awards), +77% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 20.117 · Airport Infrastructure Grants ($160.6K).

Assistance · FY2026
$160.6K
New awards
1
Actions
1
Since FY2021
$1.5M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 332.2KFY2021
  2. 899.6KFY2022
  3. 91KFY2025
  4. 160.6KFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$160.6K100%

Top programs

  1. 20.117 · Airport Infrastructure Grants$160.6K100%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Transportation

Largest awards

  1. 20.117 · Airport Infrastructure Grants· Federal Aviation Administration· Project grant· Sep 14, 2026 – Sep 14, 2026· 33000160142026

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $40K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE MONTANA$40K100%
    HELENA, MT · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $210K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $105.9K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $72K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $40K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $1.4M reported

  1. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE MONTANA$970K
    HELENA, MT · 3 subawards
  2. HELENA, MT · 4 subawards
  3. FORT HARRISON, MT · 3 subawards

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CITY OF GRANITE CITY$69.1K−0.3% in FY2026
    GRANITE CITY, IL · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Justice, public order, and safety activities
  2. COUNTY OF FALL RIVER$65.4K+1.3% in FY2026
    HOT SPRINGS, SD · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Justice, public order, and safety activities
  3. ST LANDRY PARISH SHERIFFS OFFICE$69.6K−100% in FY2026
    OPELOUSAS, LA · 100.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Justice, public order, and safety activities

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.