Federal contractor · SUPERIOR, MT

MEADOW CREEK CONTRACTING LLC

MEADOW CREEK CONTRACTING LLC received $308K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−16% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $1M. Its largest customer was Forest Service ($308K).

Obligations · FY2026
$308K
New awards
6
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
GUB9AUL5NQJ3
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 32.1KFY2018
  2. 24.1KFY2020
  3. 100KFY2021
  4. 81.8KFY2023
  5. 128.9KFY2024
  6. 365.8KFY2025
  7. 308KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Forest Service$308K100%
    6 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$308K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Clark County, WA$127.9K42%
  2. La Plata County, CO$69.5K23%
  3. Flathead County, MT$56K18%
  4. Missoula County, MT$49.6K16%
  5. Lewis and Clark County, MT$5,0251.6%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $308K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $308K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. MEADOW CREEK CONTRACTING LLC WAGPF000684 E17$127.9K
    Forest Service· Clark County, WA· Facilities & utilities· Aug 1, 2026 – Aug 1, 2026· 1202SB26M2783
  2. MEADOW CREEK CONTRACTING LLC COSJF000536 E141$69.5K
    Forest Service· La Plata County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Jul 5, 2026 – Jul 5, 2026· 1202SB26M1753
  3. MEADOW CREEK CONTRACTING LLC MTFNF000306 E174$56K
    Forest Service· Flathead County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Aug 7, 2026 – Aug 7, 2026· 1202SB26M2463
  4. MEADOW CREEK CONTRACTING LLC MTLNF260296 E37$27.9K
    Forest Service· Missoula County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Jul 26, 2026 – Jul 26, 2026· 1202SB26M1750
  5. MEADOW CREEK CONTRACTING LLC MTLNF260244 E6$21.7K
    Forest Service· Missoula County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Jul 9, 2026 – Jul 9, 2026· 1202SB26M1081
  6. MEADOW CREEK CONTRACTING LLC MTHLF000497 E12$5,025
    Forest Service· Lewis and Clark County, MT· Facilities & utilities· Jul 27, 2026 – Jul 27, 2026· 1202SB26M1683

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. B & C DEMOLITION INC$826.8K−100% in FY2026
    FRESNO, CA · 98% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryForest Service · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment rental and leasing
  2. HOME STYLE WATER TENDIN', LLC$779.6K+242% in FY2026
    TAOS, NM · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestry
  3. MIKE WIRTH CONSTRUCTION LLC$823.5K−100% in FY2026
    WOLF CREEK, MT · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Support activities for forestryForest Service · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment rental and leasing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.