Federal contractor · REDWOOD CITY, CA

MELTWATER NEWS US INC

MELTWATER NEWS US INC received $243.9K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (−54% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $4.8M. Its largest customer was Bureau of the Fiscal Service ($132.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$243.9K
New awards
7
Sole-source
4.9%
Single offer
54%
UEI
Z16AMBEQWN86
Other than small businessForeign-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 230.2KFY2017
  2. 289.6KFY2018
  3. 356.5KFY2019
  4. 557.2KFY2020
  5. 609.3KFY2021
  6. 828.3KFY2022
  7. 625.5KFY2023
  8. 502KFY2024
  9. 524.5KFY2025
  10. 243.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 2 awards
  3. 2 awards
  4. 1 awards
  5. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$132.1K54%
  2. Professional services$111.8K46%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$63.8K26%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition59%
    US 39% · $144.1K
  • Sole-source awards4.9%
    US 30% · $12K
  • Single-offer competitions54%
    US 8.7% · $132.1K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of the Fiscal Service· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Mar 14, 2022 – Feb 9, 2026· 20340922C00004
  2. Department of State· Professional services· Sep 18, 2023 – Jun 29, 2026· 19CA5223C0017
  3. Department of the Army· Arlington County, VA· Professional services· Apr 13, 2023 – Mar 24, 2026· W91QV123P0018
  4. Office of Justice Programs· San Mateo County, CA· Professional services· Sep 17, 2021 – Jan 22, 2026· 15PBJS21F00000034
  5. Bureau of Land Management· Jefferson County, CO· Facilities & utilities· Jul 21, 2022 – Feb 5, 2026· 140L1722P0031
  6. Department of State· Professional services· Jul 7, 2026 – Jul 7, 2026· 19ET1026P0925
  7. Department of the Army· Warren County, MS· Professional services· Mar 18, 2026 – Mar 18, 2026· W912HZ26PA029

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $52K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $109.1K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $382K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $149.2K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $268.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $960.2K reported

  1. GROTON, CT · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. MCLEAN, VA · 4 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  3. BETHESDA, MD · 2 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 13 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CHICAGO, IL · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of the Fiscal Service · Other information services
  2. DEALOGIC, L.L.C.$918.9K−23% in FY2026
    NEW YORK, NY · 24% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of the Fiscal Service · Other information services
  3. INFOPRO DIGITAL, INC$1.8M−1.4% in FY2026
    NEW YORK, NY · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveSecurities and Exchange Commission · Media streaming, social networks, and other media networks and content providers

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.