Federal contractor · PRAIA DA VITORIA
MENESES & MCFADDEN, CARTOR, VITOR HUGO CARVALHO, LDA
MENESES & MCFADDEN, CARTOR, VITOR HUGO CARVALHO, LDA received $4.4M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 24 awards (+14% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $49.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($4.1M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $4.4M
- New awards
- 24
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 3.8%
- UEI
- TJT9J772AUM3
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 2.8KFY2017
- 2.7KFY2018
- 878.7KFY2019
- 5.1MFY2020
- 5.8MFY2021
- 8.2MFY2022
- 7.6MFY2023
- 14MFY2024
- 3.9MFY2025
- 4.4MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Air Force$4.1M93%22 awards
- Defense Commissary Agency$312.1K7.1%2 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$4.1M93%
- Facilities & utilities$259.2K5.9%
- Other equipment & supplies$44.6K1.0%
Where the work was performed
- Abroad$4.4M100%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition3.8%US 39% · $167.3K
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions3.8%US 8.7% · $167.3K
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Sep 26, 2024 – Mar 11, 2026· FA448624F0026
- Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Feb 10, 2026 – Feb 10, 2026· FA448626F0004
- Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Sep 19, 2024 – Jan 7, 2026· FA448624F0024
- Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Sep 27, 2024 – Feb 2, 2026· FA448624F0029
- Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Jun 19, 2023 – May 20, 2026· FA448623F0010
- Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· Apr 21, 2026 – Apr 21, 2026· FA448626F0011
- Department of the Air Force· Construction & real property· May 29, 2025 – May 20, 2026· FA448625F0013
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- FRAZIER INVESTMENTS, INC.$21.2M−34% in FY2026LAFAYETTE, LA · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
- NVE-HHI JV$19.8M−37% in FY2026HIGHLAND, UT · 86% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
- TANAKA GUMI TANAKA CONSTRUCTION KONNO KENSETSU JV$18.8M−63% in FY2026TOWADA, JPN · 84% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.