Federal contractor · SAN MARCOS, TX

MENSOR, LP.

MENSOR, LP. received $1,897 in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−100% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $5.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($1,897).

Obligations · FY2026
$1,897
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
UXBLPRNKHNS8
Other than small businessForeign-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 759.4KFY2017
  2. 851.9KFY2018
  3. 1.5MFY2019
  4. 51.3KFY2020
  5. 3.2KFY2021
  6. -1.4MFY2022
  7. 115.9KFY2023
  8. 31.5KFY2024
  9. 3.6MFY2025
  10. 1.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$1,897100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$1,897100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Portsmouth city, VA$1,897100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1,897
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $1,897
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of the Navy$1,897
    Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. SERVICE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE AN UNCERTAINTY-BASED CALIBRATION WHICH INCLUDES A CALIBRATION REPORT AS EXPRESSED IAW, GUIDE TO THE EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT AND NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY TECHNICAL PUBLICATION 1297.$1,897
    Department of the Navy· Portsmouth city, VA· Equipment maintenance· Mar 3, 2026 – Mar 3, 2026· N4215826PN032

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $63.4K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $47.1K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $46.3K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $156.8K reported

  1. RAYTHEON COMPANY$79.3K
    TUCSON, AZ · 2 subawards · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION$77.5K
    RESTON, VA · 2 subawards · Semiconductor and other electronic component manufacturing

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. STAR DYNAMICS CORP$3.4M−100% in FY2026
    HILLIARD, OH · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  2. SANTA BARBARA INFRARED, INC.$3.7M
    SANTA BARBARA, CA · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing
  3. CLARKE HESS COMMUNICATION RESEARCH CORP$4.3M−85% in FY2026
    MEDFORD, NY · 93% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturingNavy · Navigational, measuring, electromedical, and control instruments manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.