Federal contractor · MILTON, FL
MIA GENERAL CONTRACTING LLC
MIA GENERAL CONTRACTING LLC received $423K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 11 awards (−92% vs FY2025). Since FY2018: $56.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($302.7K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $423K
- New awards
- 11
- Sole-source
- 28%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- GKNAX87LFK71
- Parent company
- MIA GENERAL CONTRACTING LLC
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 4.9MFY2018
- 2.7MFY2019
- 7.1MFY2020
- 10.5MFY2021
- 10.2MFY2022
- 6.1MFY2023
- 9.9MFY2024
- 5MFY2025
- 423KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Air Force$302.7K72%6 awards
- Department of the Army$120.3K28%4 awards
- Department of the Navy$00.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$302.7K72%
- Equipment maintenance$120.3K28%
Where the work was performed
- Hampton city, VA$191.2K45%
- Oklahoma County, OK$111.5K26%
- Pushmataha County, OK$60.9K14%
- Sequoyah County, OK$59.4K14%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition28%US 39% · $120.3K
- Sole-source awards28%US 30% · $120.3K
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Department of the Army$120.3KDepartment of Defense · 3 awards
Largest awards
- Department of the Air Force· Oklahoma County, OK· Construction & real property· Nov 17, 2023 – May 5, 2026· FA813724F0004
- Department of the Navy· Santa Rosa County, FL· Construction & real property· Sep 25, 2024 – Dec 29, 2025· N6945024C0077
- Department of the Air Force· Oklahoma County, OK· Construction & real property· Apr 21, 2023 – Apr 27, 2026· FA813723F0022
- B4132 AND B2340 HVAC$552.4KDepartment of the Army· Comanche County, OK· Construction & real property· Sep 30, 2023 – Feb 12, 2026· W912BV23F0222
- Department of the Air Force· Hampton city, VA· Construction & real property· Apr 21, 2026 – Apr 21, 2026· FA480026F0047
- Department of the Army· Pushmataha County, OK· Equipment maintenance· Mar 5, 2026 – Apr 13, 2026· W912BV26FA028
- Department of the Air Force· Hampton city, VA· Construction & real property· Apr 23, 2026 – Jun 12, 2026· FA480026F0045
- Department of the Army· Sequoyah County, OK· Equipment maintenance· Dec 19, 2025 – Jan 29, 2026· W912BV26FA014
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 12 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- RDZ CONTRACTORS, INC.$7.6M−101% in FY2026NIPOMO, CA · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
- VERDIS - TAKISAKI$7.9M−15% in FY2026COEUR D ALENE, ID · 2 entities · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
- SANKYO DENKI OHNA DENKEN JV$7.9M+1,580,139% in FY2026NAHA, JPN · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.