Federal contractor · DORAL, FL

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY received -$17.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−2,272% vs FY2025). Since FY2022: $3.5M. Its largest customer was Food and Drug Administration (-$17.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
-$17.1K
New awards
2
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
VHCBJ9FMG7F7
Other than small businessGovernment entity

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

8 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $244.1K in FY2026 together.

  1. MIAMI-DADE COUNTYDORAL, FL · Family page
    -$17.1K
  2. $261.2K
  3. $0
  4. $0
  5. $0
  6. $0
  7. $0
  8. $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 957.7KFY2022
  2. 1.7MFY2023
  3. 804.2KFY2024
  4. 785FY2025
  5. -17.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Food and Drug Administration· Miami-Dade County, FL· Professional services· Mar 21, 2023 – May 31, 2026· 75F40123C00025
  2. Food and Drug Administration· Miami-Dade County, FL· Professional services· Jan 23, 2024 – Jun 11, 2026· 75F40124C00022

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

MIAMI-DADE COUNTY received -$2.1M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 17 actions (6 new awards), −331% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 21.016 · Equitable Sharing ($18.2K).

Assistance · FY2026
-$2.1M
New awards
6
Actions
17
Since FY2021
$30.3M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 1.2MFY2021
  2. 13.5MFY2022
  3. 11.1MFY2023
  4. 5.7MFY2024
  5. 921.5KFY2025
  6. -2.1MFY2026

By type

  1. Direct payments$18.2K100%
  2. Grants-$2.1M0.0%

Top programs

  1. 21.016 · Equitable Sharing$18.2K0.0%
  2. 16.320 · Services for Trafficking Victims-$22.2K0.0%
  3. 16.741 · Dna Backlog Reduction Program-$120.1K0.0%
  4. 19.703 · Criminal Justice Systems-$2M0.0%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of the Treasury

Largest awards

  1. 19.703 · Criminal Justice Systems· Department of State· Cooperative agreement· Jun 19, 2022 – Feb 6, 2026· SINLEC22CA0255
  2. 16.741 · Dna Backlog Reduction Program· Office of Justice Programs· Formula grant· Sep 26, 2022 – Jun 9, 2026· 15PBJA22GG01632DNAX
  3. 16.741 · Dna Backlog Reduction Program· Office of Justice Programs· Formula grant· Sep 8, 2023 – May 13, 2026· 15PBJA23GG01270DNAX
  4. 16.741 · Dna Backlog Reduction Program· Office of Justice Programs· Formula grant· Dec 3, 2021 – May 15, 2026· 15PBJA21GG03111DNAX
  5. 16.320 · Services for Trafficking Victims· Office of Justice Programs· Cooperative agreement· Dec 9, 2021 – Feb 13, 2026· 15POVC21GK04076HT
  6. 16.745 · Criminal and Juvenile Justice and Mental Health Collaboration Program· Office of Justice Programs· Project grant· Sep 26, 2023 – Jun 5, 2026· 15PBJA23GG02199MENT

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $1.7M (5 subawards)

2 primes

  1. DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS FLORIDA$865.7K50%
    TALLAHASSEE, FL · 1 subaward
  2. TALLAHASSEE, FL · 4 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $739.5K paid out · $3.3M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.3M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $1.7M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $2.1M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.5M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $1.7M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $739.5K reported

  1. THRIVING MIND SOUTH FLORIDA, INC.$739.5K
    MIAMI, FL · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

8 companies · $1.6B reported

  1. STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF EMERGENCY M$1.4B
    TALLAHASSEE, FL · 119 subawards
  2. TALLAHASSEE, FL · 52 subawards
  3. TALLAHASSEE, FL · 71 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BRONX, NY · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons · Waste collection
  2. AMADOR VALLEY INDUSTRIES LLC$433.1K−102% in FY2026
    PLEASANTON, CA · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons · Waste collection
  3. MARTIN ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC$577.8K−24% in FY2026
    DOTHAN, AL · 26% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveFederal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons · Waste collection

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of MIAMI-DADE COUNTY (8 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Miami Dade CountyAI match · 100%
  • Miami-Dade County, FloridaAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$1M
32 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$3.2M

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$610K
    16 reports
  2. 2024$1M
    35 reports
  3. 2025$1M
    32 reports
  4. 2026$537.5K
    16 reports

Top issues

  1. Transportation57 reports
  2. Budget and appropriations44 reports
  3. Housing33 reports
  4. Environment and Superfund24 reports
  5. Urban development and municipalities24 reports
  6. Law enforcement, crime and criminal justice23 reports
  7. Marine, maritime, boating and fisheries23 reports
  8. Health issues21 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES94 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE88 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Alcalde & Fay$560K
    14 reports
  2. Greenberg Traurig, LLP$560K
    14 reports
  3. Thorn Run Partners$430K
    10 reports
  4. CONTINENTAL STRATEGY, LLC$323.8K
    10 reports
  5. BALLARD PARTNERS$300K
    10 reports
  6. Empire Consulting Group$290K
    10 reports
  7. Pittman Law Group$215K
    10 reports
  8. LSN PARTNERS, LLC$210K
    10 reports

10 firms in all. Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.