Federal contractor · MOON TOWNSHIP, PA

MICHAEL BAKER-STANLEY JOINT VENTURE

MICHAEL BAKER-STANLEY JOINT VENTURE received $589.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 4 awards (−80% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $16.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($589.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$589.1K
New awards
4
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
HFY1NMK9LT77
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1KFY2019
  2. 1.3MFY2021
  3. 541.9KFY2022
  4. 10.9MFY2023
  5. 577.1KFY2024
  6. 2.9MFY2025
  7. 589.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Navy$589.1K100%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Army$00.0%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$589.1K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Nueces County, TX$589.1K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. THROUGH 100% DESIGN$3.5M
    Department of the Army· Allegheny County, PA· Construction & real property· Aug 24, 2023 – Dec 19, 2025· W912DY23F0208
  2. THROUGH 100% DESIGN$2.9M
    Department of the Army· Allegheny County, PA· Construction & real property· May 24, 2023 – Dec 19, 2025· W912DY23F0128
  3. BASE HUNTER AFF MICROGRID$2.2M
    Department of the Army· Allegheny County, PA· Construction & real property· Dec 8, 2022 – Nov 13, 2025· W912DY23F0013
  4. AE DESIGN AND RELATED SERVICES TO COMPLETE RUNWAY REPAIRS, NAS CORPUS CHRISTI, TX.$589.1K
    Department of the Navy· Nueces County, TX· Construction & real property· Mar 10, 2026 – Mar 10, 2026· N6945026F0165

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $40.3K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $63.1K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

2 companies · $103.4K reported

  1. JACA & SIERRA ENGINEERING, PSC$63.1K
    TRUJILLO ALTO, PR · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.$40.3K
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

No prime reported paying it.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. INK ARCH, LLC$3.7M−91% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesNavy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. STANLEY-OLSSON JOINT VENTURE$3.5M−98% in FY2026
    CENTENNIAL, CO · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. KCI TECHNOLOGIES - PENNONI ASSOCIATES JOINT VENTURE$3.5M−101% in FY2026
    SPARKS, MD · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.