Federal contractor · FEDERAL WAY, WA

MICRO-X INC

MICRO-X INC received $1.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−68% vs FY2025). Since FY2021: $16.4M. Its largest customer was Office of Procurement Operations ($1.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.5M
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
VBPNEDNLPCR3
Small businessForeign-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.9MFY2021
  2. 1.6MFY2022
  3. 4.9MFY2023
  4. 601.8KFY2024
  5. 4.8MFY2025
  6. 1.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$1.5M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $1.6M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.8% · $1.6M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Office of Procurement Operations· King County, WA· Research & development· Sep 28, 2021 – Sep 24, 2026· 70RSAT21CB0000016
  2. Office of Procurement Operations· King County, WA· Research & development· Sep 28, 2021 – May 21, 2026· 70RSAT21CB0000020

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

MICRO-X INC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 1 actions (0 new awards), −100% vs FY2025.

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
1
Since FY2025
$8.2M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 8.2MFY2025
  2. 0FY2026

Largest awards

  1. 93.384 · Advanced Research Projects Agency for Health (Arpa-H)· National Institutes of Health· Direct payment for specified use· Nov 15, 2024 – Apr 6, 2026· AY2AX000063

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2025–FY2026.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. QUADRIDOX INC.$8M+53% in FY2026
    DURHAM, NC · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of Procurement Operations · Scientific research and development services
  2. SAN FRANCISCO, CA · 63% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of Procurement Operations · Scientific research and development services
  3. STOCKTON-ON-TEES, GBR · 61% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of Procurement Operations · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Micro-X, Inc.AI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$40K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$160K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$60K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$40K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$40K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$20K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense14 reports
  2. Homeland security4 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. BAKER DONELSON BEARMAN CALDWELL & BERKOWITZ$120K
    10 reports
  2. DB3, LLC (fka THE DASCHLE GROUP)$40K
    4 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.