Federal contractor · SAN FRANCISCO, CA

MICROAETH CORPORATION

No contract obligations recorded for MICROAETH CORPORATION in FY2026. Since FY2017: $1.2M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
NVFHWSQWBC69
Parent company
MICROAETH CORPORATION
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 57.8KFY2017
  2. 32.9KFY2018
  3. 154.3KFY2019
  4. 725.1KFY2020
  5. 112.4KFY2021
  6. 0FY2022
  7. 0FY2023
  8. 153.4KFY2024
  9. 0FY2025

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for MICROAETH CORPORATION in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Exclusions in SAM.gov

Records of the SAM.gov exclusions list (parties debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment or otherwise excluded) matched to this recipient by its Unique Entity ID or CAGE code.

This section could not be loaded right now. Reload the page to try again.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

This section could not be loaded right now. Reload the page to try again.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $56.4K reported

  1. GERMANTOWN, MD · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. VANCOUVER, CAN · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · Scientific research and development services
  2. BOSTON, MA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · Scientific research and development services
  3. VERNON HILLS, IL · 74% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

This section could not be loaded right now. Reload the page to try again.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.