Federal contractor · MINNEAPOLIS, MN

MID-AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS & EQUIPMENT INC

MID-AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS & EQUIPMENT INC received $3,875 in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−96% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.3M. Its largest customer was Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education ($3,875).

Obligations · FY2026
$3,875
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
CSNDP5DJHAN7
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedMinority-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 157.5KFY2017
  2. 68.7KFY2018
  3. 92.2KFY2019
  4. 237.4KFY2020
  5. 120.1KFY2021
  6. 264.2KFY2022
  7. 168.7KFY2023
  8. 98.5KFY2024
  9. 108.1KFY2025
  10. 3.9KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education$3,875100%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Air Force$00.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$3,875100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Hennepin County, MN$3,875100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. VLM MAINTENANCE SERVICES$130.9K
    Department of the Air Force· Sedgwick County, KS· Equipment maintenance· Sep 18, 2023 – May 4, 2026· FA462123C0016
  2. EO 14398: DISASSEMBLE, REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF LEKTRIEVER FOR THE MIDWEST REGIONAL OFFICE.$3,875
    Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education· Hennepin County, MN· Equipment maintenance· Jun 24, 2026 – Jun 24, 2026· 140A0626P0003

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $191.8K reported

  1. RAZOR CONSULTING SOLUTIONS, INC$140.8K
    FARGO, ND · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
  2. KORTE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY$51K
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. DIDSBURY INC.$82.1K
    COPPELL, TX · 39% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment repair and maintenance
  2. PTA TECHNOLOGIES LLC$80.5K−170% in FY2026
    STONY BROOK, NY · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment repair and maintenance
  3. RON WHITES AIR COMPRESSOR SALES INC$80.3K−100% in FY2026
    ANDERSON, SC · 38% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment repair and maintenance

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.