Federal contractor · MILLER, SD
MID DAKOTA VEGETATION MANAGEMENT, LLC
MID DAKOTA VEGETATION MANAGEMENT, LLC received $194.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (−30% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $8.2M. Its largest customer was Department of Energy ($193.6K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $194.3K
- New awards
- 6
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- YKSXPXMHSJX3
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 866.4KFY2017
- 849.5KFY2018
- 941.7KFY2019
- 867KFY2020
- 934.7KFY2021
- 807.9KFY2022
- 1.3MFY2023
- 1.1MFY2024
- 276.8KFY2025
- 194.3KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of Energy$193.6K99.6%2 awards
- Department of the Army$100.8K52%3 awards
- Forest Service-$100K0.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Facilities & utilities$294.3K100%
Where the work was performed
- Hand County, SD$193.6K99.6%
- Buffalo County, SD$48K25%
- Stanley County, SD$29.8K15%
- Hughes County, SD$22.9K12%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of Energy· Hand County, SD· Facilities & utilities· May 4, 2022 – Aug 27, 2026· 89503422CWA000059
- Department of Energy· Hand County, SD· Facilities & utilities· Mar 27, 2026 – Mar 27, 2026· 89503426CWA000085
- Department of the Army· Hughes County, SD· Facilities & utilities· Apr 28, 2023 – Feb 23, 2026· W9128F23P0034
- BB NOXIOUS WEEDS$48KDepartment of the Army· Buffalo County, SD· Facilities & utilities· Jun 2, 2026 – Jun 2, 2026· W9128F26PA062
- Department of the Army· Stanley County, SD· Facilities & utilities· Mar 26, 2026 – Mar 26, 2026· W9128F26FA052
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 5 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- FEIBEL TERI$756.3K+1.1% in FY2026THORNE BAY, AK · 46% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Services to buildings and dwellings
- OPPORTUNITY RESOURCES INC$727K+44% in FY2026MISSOULA, MT · 42% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Services to buildings and dwellings
- B-B BUILDING MAINTENANCE, INC.$851.4K+1.3% in FY2026MISSOULA, MT · 44% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Services to buildings and dwellings
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.