Federal contractor · WESTLAKE, LA

MIKE HOOKS, LLC

MIKE HOOKS, LLC received $50.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 11 awards (+3.4% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $562.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($50.2M).

Obligations · FY2026
$50.2M
New awards
11
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
F5UYXMGLZWK3
Other than small businessWoman-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 32.5MFY2017
  2. 68.6MFY2018
  3. 66MFY2019
  4. 72.2MFY2020
  5. 39.5MFY2021
  6. 97.8MFY2022
  7. 44.4MFY2023
  8. 42.7MFY2024
  9. 48.5MFY2025
  10. 50.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 11 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$50.2M100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Galveston County, TX· Construction & real property· Sep 24, 2025 – May 6, 2026· W912HY25CA010
  2. Department of the Army· St. Mary Parish, LA· Construction & real property· Sep 25, 2024 – Mar 19, 2026· W912P824C0040
  3. Department of the Army· Galveston County, TX· Construction & real property· Jun 5, 2026 – Jun 5, 2026· W912HY26CA020
  4. Department of the Army· Mobile County, AL· Construction & real property· Mar 24, 2025 – Apr 1, 2026· W9127825F0099
  5. Department of the Army· Jackson County, MS· Construction & real property· Jun 1, 2026 – Jun 1, 2026· W9127826FA142
  6. Department of the Army· Jackson County, MS· Construction & real property· Jul 8, 2025 – Dec 23, 2025· W9127825FA065
  7. Department of the Army· Harrison County, MS· Construction & real property· Dec 16, 2025 – Mar 2, 2026· W9127826FA035
  8. Department of the Army· Mobile County, AL· Construction & real property· Mar 11, 2026 – Mar 11, 2026· W9127826FA082

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. LUHR CROSBY, LLC$140.5M−69% in FY2026
    COLUMBIA, IL · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  2. BRONX, NY · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction
  3. HOUSTON, TX · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other heavy and civil engineering construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Mike Hooks, LLCAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$80K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$200K
$40K in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$40K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$40K
    3 reports
  3. 2025$80K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$40K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Marine, maritime, boating and fisheries13 reports
  2. Veterans6 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES13 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE13 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. The Picard Group, LLC$160K
    8 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.