Federal contractor · KAYSVILLE, UT

MILITARY INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

MILITARY INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY received $13.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−100% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $7.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($13.3K).

Obligations · FY2026
$13.3K
New awards
1
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
NPE1C3S9WS54
Other than small businessGovernment entity
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 891.8KFY2017
  2. -31.1KFY2018
  3. 15.9KFY2020
  4. 75.6KFY2021
  5. 49.1KFY2022
  6. 584.8KFY2024
  7. 6.2MFY2025
  8. 13.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$13.3K100%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$13.3K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Davis County, UT$13.3K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $13.3K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $13.3K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. THE PURPOSE OF THIS CONTRACT IS TO DEMOLISH MULTIPLE BUILDINGS (890, 892, 894, 895, 897, 899)$2.2M
    Department of the Air Force· Davis County, UT· Construction & real property· Feb 24, 2025 – Dec 17, 2025· FA820125F0080

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

MILITARY INSTALLATION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 0 actions (0 new awards).

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
0

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 3MFY2024

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2024.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. NORTHRIDGE CONSTRUCTION GROUP LLC$7.1M
    NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
  2. Q PRO TRADING AND CONTRACTING$6.3M−64% in FY2026
    AL WAKRA, QAT · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction
  3. RDZ CONTRACTORS, INC.$7.6M−101% in FY2026
    NIPOMO, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.