Federal contractor · PRINCETON, NJ
MILLS & SCHNOERING ARCHITECTS LLC
MILLS & SCHNOERING ARCHITECTS LLC received $2.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (+830% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $23.1M. Its largest customer was Smithsonian Institution ($2.5M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $2.5M
- New awards
- 7
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- HNMWJBXGNWL4
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 5.8MFY2017
- 2.7MFY2018
- 3.9MFY2019
- 2MFY2020
- 841.5KFY2021
- 1.3MFY2022
- 2.2MFY2023
- 1.6MFY2024
- 273.3KFY2025
- 2.5MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Smithsonian Institution$2.5M100%4 awards
- Public Buildings Service-$1,8250.0%3 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Construction & real property$2.5M100%
Where the work was performed
- District of Columbia, DC$1.7M65%
- New York County, NY$879.9K35%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · -$1,825
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · -$1,825
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Smithsonian Institution· District of Columbia, DC· Construction & real property· Jan 20, 2026 – Apr 22, 2026· 33330226FF0010090
- Smithsonian Institution· New York County, NY· Construction & real property· Aug 13, 2026 – Aug 13, 2026· 33330226FF0010370
- Public Buildings Service· Essex County, NJ· Construction & real property· Apr 15, 2022 – Feb 11, 2026· 47PC0222F0020
- Smithsonian Institution· District of Columbia, DC· Construction & real property· Nov 19, 2025 – Jul 21, 2026· 33330226FF0010023
- Smithsonian Institution· District of Columbia, DC· Construction & real property· Sep 9, 2026 – Sep 9, 2026· 33330226FF0010417
- Public Buildings Service· Essex County, NJ· Construction & real property· Jul 13, 2023 – Jul 20, 2026· 47PC0223F0055
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2022: $199.9K paid out · $0 received
- FY2023: $83.9K paid out · $0 received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
8 companies · $283.8K reported
- NEW YORK, NY · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- HENRY ADAMS, LLC$44.5KBALTIMORE, MD · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- BECKER & FRONDORF$35KPHILADELPHIA, PA · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Primes that pay it
No prime reported paying it.
Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- HARTMAN-COX ARCHITECTS LLP$5.2M−57% in FY2026WASHINGTON, DC · 94% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveSmithsonian Institution · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- PAGE-LORING LLC$3M−54% in FY2026HOUSTON, TX · 68% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveSmithsonian Institution · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- ARCHITRAVE P.C.$5M−57% in FY2026WASHINGTON, DC · 79% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveSmithsonian Institution · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesPublic Buildings Service · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.