Federal contractor · EAST THETFORD, VT
MIND COMPUTING, INC.
MIND COMPUTING, INC. received $29.6M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (+113% vs FY2025). Since FY2022: $53.6M. Its largest customer was Department of Veterans Affairs ($29.5M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $29.6M
- New awards
- 7
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- WLWRCWJAH9Q8
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 2MFY2022
- 1.1MFY2023
- 7MFY2024
- 13.9MFY2025
- 29.6MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of Veterans Affairs$29.5M99.6%5 awards
- 1 awards
- Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%1 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- IT & telecom$29.6M100.0%
- Research & development$5000.0%
Where the work was performed
- Windsor County, VT$28.6M96%
- Orange County, VT$915.5K3.1%
- Montgomery County, MD$120.7K0.4%
- Madison County, AL$5000.0%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · -$169.8K
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · -$169.8K
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Department of Veterans Affairs· Windsor County, VT· IT & telecom· Apr 21, 2025 – Jul 20, 2026· 36C10B25F0083
- Department of Veterans Affairs· Windsor County, VT· IT & telecom· Dec 2, 2025 – Sep 3, 2026· 36C10B26N10330004
- Department of Veterans Affairs· Windsor County, VT· IT & telecom· Sep 29, 2022 – Dec 2, 2025· 36C10B22N10330001
- Department of Veterans Affairs· Orange County, VT· IT & telecom· Nov 6, 2023 – Feb 3, 2026· 36C10B24N10330002
- Department of Veterans Affairs· Windsor County, VT· IT & telecom· Jan 16, 2026 – Jan 16, 2026· 36C10B26N10330005
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration· Montgomery County, MD· IT & telecom· Sep 24, 2024 – Aug 6, 2026· 1305M424F0222
- Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 5, 2025 – Jun 10, 2026· HQ085926FE340
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2021: $0 paid out · $4.6M received
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $6.8M received
- FY2024: $0 paid out · $258.8K received
- FY2025: $0 paid out · $3.7M received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
2 companies · $15.4M reported
- VETERANS EZ INFO INC.$15.1MSAN DIEGO, CA · 7 subawards · Computer systems design and related services
- LA CROSSE, WI · 1 subaward · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- CLIENT FIRST TECHNOLOGIES, INC$60.2M+91% in FY2026FAIRFAX, VA · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Computer systems design and related services
- CIVITASDX LLC$62.3M−52% in FY2026SAN DIEGO, CA · 99% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Computer systems design and related services
- AMIDA TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.$40.9M−100% in FY2026WASHINGTON, DC · 79% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Computer systems design and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.