Federal contractor · RIVERSIDE, IL

MIRAMAR INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.

MIRAMAR INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. received $778.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 13 awards (−70% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $21.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($749.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$778.6K
New awards
13
Sole-source
33%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
WDE3JVGRED13
Small businessVeteran-ownedService-disabled veteran-ownedMinority-owned8(a) program

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 992.9KFY2017
  2. 2.2MFY2018
  3. 1.9MFY2019
  4. 2.3MFY2020
  5. 2.6MFY2021
  6. 3.1MFY2022
  7. 2.8MFY2023
  8. 2.3MFY2024
  9. 2.6MFY2025
  10. 778.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 11 awards
  2. 2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$430.3K55%
  2. Construction & real property$318.9K41%
  3. Professional services$29.4K3.8%

Where the work was performed

  1. York County, ME$285.2K37%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition33%
    US 39% · $257.2K
  • Sole-source awards33%
    US 30% · $257.2K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Defense · 3 awards

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Navy· Milwaukee County, WI· Construction & real property· Jan 30, 2026 – Jan 30, 2026· N4008526F0101
  2. Department of the Navy· York County, ME· Construction & real property· May 7, 2025 – Nov 14, 2025· N4008525F5095
  3. Department of the Navy· York County, ME· Facilities & utilities· Jan 15, 2026 – Jan 31, 2026· N4008526F0163
  4. Department of the Navy· Brown County, WI· Facilities & utilities· Feb 2, 2026 – Mar 13, 2026· N4008526F0438
  5. Department of the Navy· York County, ME· Facilities & utilities· Nov 12, 2025 – Mar 17, 2026· N4008526F0074
  6. Department of the Navy· Rock Island County, IL· Construction & real property· Mar 30, 2026 – Mar 30, 2026· N4008526F0689
  7. Department of the Navy· Milwaukee County, WI· Construction & real property· Dec 23, 2025 – Dec 23, 2025· N4008526F0100
  8. Department of the Navy· Milwaukee County, WI· Construction & real property· Dec 23, 2025 – Dec 23, 2025· N4008526F0031

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 4 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HANA-TUNISTA LLC$4.5M−100% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Facilities support services
  2. MITOMO MARUTAKA JV$4.1M+1,327% in FY2026
    OKINAWA-SHI, JPN · 65% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Facilities support services
  3. LBM INC.$5.6M−93% in FY2026
    DUNN, NC · 75% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNavy · Facilities support services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 11, 2026, loaded Oct 11, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 11, 2026, loaded Oct 11, 2026.