Federal contractor · ANNAPOLIS, MD

MISSION CRITICAL TEAM INSTITUTE, LLC

MISSION CRITICAL TEAM INSTITUTE, LLC received $139.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−69% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $1.3M. Its largest customer was U.S. Special Operations Command ($139.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$139.1K
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
NMWNCUL4K1A9
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 47.3KFY2019
  2. 106.3KFY2020
  3. 24.8KFY2021
  4. 15KFY2022
  5. 41.5KFY2023
  6. 437.5KFY2024
  7. 445.7KFY2025
  8. 139.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. U.S. Special Operations Command$139.1K100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Education & social services$139.1K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. San Diego County, CA$92.7K67%
  2. Anne Arundel County, MD$46.4K33%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $139.1K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $139.1K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. U.S. Special Operations Command$139.1K
    Department of Defense · 2 awards

Largest awards

  1. MISSION CRITICAL TEAM DEVELOPMENT TRAINING IAW WITH ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS UNDER THE CONTRACT AND THIS TASK ORDER.$92.7K
    U.S. Special Operations Command· San Diego County, CA· Education & social services· Mar 27, 2026 – Mar 27, 2026· H9224026FE186
  2. MISSION CRITICAL TEAM INSTITUTE TRAINING ISO NSWG8. REF:H9224024D0014.$46.4K
    U.S. Special Operations Command· Anne Arundel County, MD· Education & social services· Apr 2, 2026 – Apr 2, 2026· H9224026FE190

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. ROCKFORD GRAY, LLC$463.1K−40% in FY2026
    DENVER, CO · 45% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Secret Service · Business schools and computer and management training
  2. MOTIVE INTERNATIONAL, LLC$686.1K+7.7% in FY2026
    WASHINGTON, DC · 49% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Special Operations Command · Business schools and computer and management training
  3. RJC GROUP CORP$361.3K−7.7% in FY2026
    COLUMBIA, SC · 35% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveU.S. Special Operations Command · Business schools and computer and management training

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.