Federal contractor · JEFFERSON CITY, MO

MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES

MISSOURI DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES received $16.9M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−64% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $373.6M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($16.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$16.9M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
4.8%
UEI
H4V6L53UEHB8
Other than small businessGovernment entity
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 43.4MFY2017
  2. 33.8MFY2018
  3. 28.4MFY2019
  4. 48.8MFY2020
  5. 32.7MFY2021
  6. 30MFY2022
  7. 37.4MFY2023
  8. 55.9MFY2024
  9. 46.3MFY2025
  10. 16.9MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$16.9M100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$16.9M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Pulaski County, MO$16.9M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition4.8%
    US 39% · $808K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions4.8%
    US 8.7% · $808K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. TASK ORDER FOR OY4 FOR FULL FOOD SERVICE.$44.4M
    Department of the Army· Pulaski County, MO· Facilities & utilities· Apr 2, 2025 – Feb 26, 2026· W911S725FA088
  2. ORDERING PERIOD FOR OY5 FULL FOOD SERVICE FOR 5 MONTH TASK ORDER. POP 01 APRIL 2026 TO 31 AUGUST 2026$15.6M
    Department of the Army· Pulaski County, MO· Facilities & utilities· Mar 24, 2026 – Mar 24, 2026· W911S726FA070
  3. THE PURPOSE OF THIS AWARD IS TO PROCESS A FINAL PAYMENT IN THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF $807,989.23 AGAINST THE CLAIM ON CONTRACT W9124J-21-D0002$808K
    Department of the Army· Pulaski County, MO· Facilities & utilities· Mar 5, 2026 – Mar 5, 2026· W911S726PA005

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SOUTHERN FOODSERVICE MANAGEMENT INC$90.6M+15% in FY2026
    MOUNTAIN BRK, AL · 76% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Special food services
  2. SOUTH CAROLINA COMMISSION FOR BLIND$181.5M−3.3% in FY2026
    COLUMBIA, SC · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Special food services
  3. DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION SERVICES$70.7M−72% in FY2026
    OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 59% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Special food services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.