Federal contractor · SPRINGFIELD, MO

MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY

No contract obligations recorded for MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY in FY2026. Since FY2017: $12.9M. It also received $31.6M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
CL7KJX2VFHS9
Other than small businessEducational institution

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 78.3KFY2017
  2. 305.3KFY2018
  3. 4.2MFY2019
  4. 268.2KFY2020
  5. 3.3MFY2021
  6. 4.7MFY2022
  7. 33.5KFY2023
  8. 39.8KFY2024

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY received $31.6M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 176 actions (12 new awards), −11% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program ($28.3M).

Assistance · FY2026
$31.6M
New awards
12
Actions
176
Since FY2021
$365.2M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 91.2MFY2021
  2. 62.6MFY2022
  3. 105.1MFY2023
  4. 39.2MFY2024
  5. 35.6MFY2025
  6. 31.6MFY2026

By type

  1. Direct payments$29.7M94%
  2. Grants$1.8M5.6%
  3. Other assistance$97.5K0.3%

Top programs

  1. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program$28.3M90%
  2. 84.033 · Federal Work-Study Program$877.4K2.8%
  3. 47.070 · Computer and Information Science and Engineering$489.2K1.5%
  4. 84.007 · Federal Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants$438.1K1.4%
  5. 66.708 · Pollution Prevention Grants Program$336.8K1.1%
  6. 84.047 · Trio Upward Bound$304.6K1.0%
  7. 47.074 · Biological Sciences$286K0.9%
  8. 10.326 · Capacity Building for Non-Land Grant Colleges of Agriculture (NLGCA)$150K0.5%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Agriculture
  2. Department of the Interior
  3. Forest Service$97.5K0.3%
    Department of Agriculture

Largest awards

  1. 93.493 · Congressional Directives· Health Resources and Services Administration· Project grant· Sep 18, 2023 – Jun 1, 2026· CE152131
  2. 93.493 · Congressional Directives· Health Resources and Services Administration· Project grant· Aug 31, 2022 – Dec 16, 2025· CE147040
  3. 84.063 · Federal Pell Grant Program· Department of Education· Direct payment for specified use· Aug 27, 2025 – Sep 2, 2026· P063P250258
  4. 11.617 · Congressionally-Identified Projects· National Institute of Standards and Technology· Project grant· Apr 5, 2023 – Feb 24, 2026· 60NANB23D013
  5. 12.910 · Research and Technology Development· Department of the Air Force· Cooperative agreement· Sep 25, 2023 – Jul 23, 2026· FA86502321088
  6. 12.800 · Air Force Defense Research Sciences Program· Department of the Air Force· Cooperative agreement· Jun 6, 2024 – Jul 27, 2026· FA86502425300

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $543.7K (7 subawards)

4 primes

  1. EL PASO, TX · 1 subaward
  2. KIRKSVILLE, MO · 1 subaward
  3. ROLLA, MO · 4 subawards
  4. PITTSBURGH, PA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $8.7M paid out · $2.6M received
  • FY2022: $6.6M paid out · $1.1M received
  • FY2023: $3.7M paid out · $954.6K received
  • FY2024: $8.1M paid out · $4M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $6.5M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $543.7K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

13 companies · $27.1M reported

  1. ROLLA, MO · 6 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. ANDOVER, MA · 3 subawards
  3. CAMBRIDGE, MA · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

21 companies · $15.6M reported

  1. JEFFERSON CITY, MO · 5 subawards
  2. DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MISSOURI$3.5M
    JEFFERSON CITY, MO · 3 subawards
  3. JEFFERSON CITY, MO · 3 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. THOMAS, CHERYL K$52.3K−100% in FY2026
    PLEASANT HILL, CA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Business schools and computer and management training
  2. PROFAIZER ASHLEY$55.5K−100% in FY2026
    MCLEAN, VA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Business schools and computer and management training
  3. AUSTIN, TX · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveState · Business schools and computer and management training

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Missouri State UniversityAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$220K
7 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$790K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$200K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$260K
    8 reports
  3. 2025$220K
    7 reports
  4. 2026$110K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations25 reports
  2. Education14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES25 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE25 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. HB STRATEGIES$590K
    14 reports
  2. Cassidy & Associates, Inc.$200K
    11 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.