Federal contractor · BAKERSFIELD, CA

MO ENTERPRISES

MO ENTERPRISES received $160.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 5 awards (−37% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $3.2M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($123.2K).

Obligations · FY2026
$160.1K
New awards
5
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
LVNZXD8D4V57
Small businessWoman-ownedMinority-owned

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 352.4KFY2017
  2. 338.1KFY2018
  3. 255.1KFY2019
  4. 297.3KFY2020
  5. 161KFY2021
  6. 427.8KFY2022
  7. 419.4KFY2023
  8. 563.4KFY2024
  9. 254.1KFY2025
  10. 160.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 4 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$123.2K77%
  2. Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles$36.9K23%

Where the work was performed

  1. Kern County, CA$125.7K78%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Logistics Agency· Kern County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Mar 11, 2026 – Mar 11, 2026· SPMYM326P2011
  2. Department of the Army· Kern County, CA· Weapons, aircraft, ships & vehicles· May 1, 2026 – May 1, 2026· W911S226PA480
  3. Defense Logistics Agency· Grayson County, TX· Other equipment & supplies· Feb 5, 2026 – Feb 5, 2026· SPMYM226P5347
  4. Defense Logistics Agency· Kern County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Nov 12, 2025 – Jan 13, 2026· SPMYM326P6001
  5. Defense Logistics Agency· Kern County, CA· Other equipment & supplies· Feb 24, 2026 – Apr 8, 2026· SPMYM326P6028

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 19 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CESCO, INC.$615.7K−28% in FY2026
    NORTH CHARLESTON, SC · 21% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other general purpose machinery manufacturingArmy · Other nonmetallic mineral product manufacturingAir Force · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment repair and maintenance+1 more
  2. MWI CORPORATION$265.7K+136% in FY2026
    DEERFIELD BEACH, FL · 17% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other general purpose machinery manufacturingArmy · Other miscellaneous manufacturing
  3. HEBER CITY, UT · 15% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Other general purpose machinery manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.