Federal contractor · BOSTON, MA

MOCA SYSTEMS, INC

MOCA SYSTEMS, INC received $5.2M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 8 awards (−43% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $65.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($4.9M).

Obligations · FY2026
$5.2M
New awards
8
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
36%
UEI
NL44K66RND13
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

3 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $5.2M in FY2026 together.

  1. MOCA SYSTEMS, INCBOSTON, MA · Family page
    $5.2M
  2. MOCA SYSTEMS, INC.NICEVILLE, FL
    $0
  3. MOCA SYSTEMS, INC.SAN ANTONIO, TX
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 5.3MFY2017
  2. 6.9MFY2018
  3. 4.5MFY2019
  4. 3.1MFY2020
  5. 8MFY2021
  6. 6.9MFY2022
  7. 8.7MFY2023
  8. 8.2MFY2024
  9. 9.1MFY2025
  10. 5.2MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$4.9M94%
    5 awards
  2. Department of Energy$328.3K6.3%
    2 awards
  3. Missile Defense Agency$5000.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$4.4M85%
  2. Professional services$794.4K15%
  3. Research & development$5000.0%

Where the work was performed

  1. Baltimore city, MD$4M77%
  2. Walla Walla County, WA$612.3K12%
  3. Fairfax County, VA$466.1K8.9%
  4. Anne Arundel County, MD$453.6K8.7%
  5. District of Columbia, DC$328.3K6.3%
  6. Madison County, AL$5000.0%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition36%
    US 39% · $1.9M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions36%
    US 8.8% · $1.9M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. REQUISITION 19MA002033 WAS CREATED TO PROVIDE PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY. THE PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE IS: BASE YEAR: 09/13/19 TO 09/12/20 OPTION YEAR 1: 09/13/20 TO 09/12/21 OPTION YEAR 2: 09/13/21 TO 09/12/22 OPTION YEA$9M
    Department of Energy· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Sep 12, 2019 – Sep 1, 2026· 89303019FMA400210
  2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SCHEDULING AND COST ESTIMATING SERVICES THROUGH THE UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (USACE) WASHINGTON HEADQUARTERS SERVICES (WHS), FACILITIES SERVICES DIRECTORATE (FSD).$4M
    Department of the Army· Baltimore city, MD· Construction & real property· May 7, 2026 – May 7, 2026· W912DR26FA164
  3. NAVFAC COST SCHEDULE RISK ANALYSIS$1.8M
    Department of the Army· Walla Walla County, WA· Construction & real property· May 31, 2024 – May 29, 2026· W912EF24F9056
  4. PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SERVICES$475K
    Department of Energy· District of Columbia, DC· Professional services· Mar 13, 2026 – Jun 26, 2026· 89303026FPM000007
  5. AE COST ENGINEERING / PROJECT CONTROLS / SCHEDULING SUPPORT FOR THE INSCOM HEADQUARTERS CONSOLIDATION PROGRAM AT FORT BELVOIR, VIRGINIA$466.1K
    Department of the Army· Fairfax County, VA· Professional services· May 26, 2026 – May 26, 2026· W912DR26FA160
  6. CYBER NATIONAL MISSION FORCE - MISSION OPERATIONS FACILITY (CNMF-MOF) INDEPENDENT COST ESTIMATE (ICE) FOR THE CNMF-MOF, A 750,000 GROSS SQUARE FOOT (GSF) FACILITY AND THE EXPANSION OF THE EAST CAMPUS PARKING STRUCTURE 4 (ECPS 4).$453.6K
    Department of the Army· Anne Arundel County, MD· Construction & real property· Jun 2, 2026 – Jun 2, 2026· W912DR26FA169
  7. SCALABLE HOMELAND INNOVATIVE ENTERPRISE LAYERED DEFENSE (SHIELD) INITIAL ORDER.$500
    Missile Defense Agency· Madison County, AL· Research & development· Dec 19, 2025 – Dec 19, 2025· HQ085926FF639
  8. UNITED STATES AIR FORCE CEIP REVIEWER/APPROVER COST ENGINEERING SUPPORT$0
    Department of the Army· Suffolk County, MA· Construction & real property· Sep 23, 2022 – Apr 13, 2026· W9123722F0271

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $206.4K (6 subawards)

1 prime

  1. BURNS & MCDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.$206.4K100%
    KANSAS CITY, MO · 6 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $1.4M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $1.7M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $2.8M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $5.3M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $3.1M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $206.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

6 companies · $14.5M reported

  1. BURNS & MCDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.$12.5M
    KANSAS CITY, MO · 154 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. CH2M HILL, INC$781.2K
    ENGLEWOOD, CO · 9 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. BLACK & VEATCH SPECIAL PROJECTS CORP.$544.4K
    OVERLAND PARK, KS · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CEMS-RS&H JV$19.1M−30% in FY2026
    SUMMERVILLE, SC · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. EA-BAKER JV$18.6M
    HUNT VALLEY, MD · 83% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. SEASIDE ENGINEERING & SURVEYING, LLC$20.1M+231% in FY2026
    BAKER, FL · 85% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.