Federal contractor · WALNUT CREEK, CA

MOFFATT AND NICHOL

MOFFATT AND NICHOL received $1.3M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (−21% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $15.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($1.3M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.3M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
LZDBJT88LJM3
Parent company
MOFFATT & NICHOL
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the MOFFATT & NICHOL company family: 8 registered entities, $921.1K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. MOFFATT & NICHOLSAN DIEGO, CA · Family page
    $0
  2. MOFFATT & NICHOLLONG BEACH, CA
    $0
  3. MOFFATT & NICHOLMOBILE, AL
    $0
  4. MOFFATT & NICHOLLONG BEACH, CA
    $0
  5. MOFFATT & NICHOLRALEIGH, NC
    $0

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 140KFY2017
  2. 2.7MFY2018
  3. 56.5KFY2019
  4. 4.3MFY2020
  5. 292.1KFY2021
  6. 176.1KFY2022
  7. 1.8MFY2023
  8. 3MFY2024
  9. 1.6MFY2025
  10. 1.3MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$1.3M100%
    3 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$1.3M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Shelby County, TN$1.1M85%
  2. Contra Costa County, CA$158.1K12%
  3. Charleston County, SC$32K2.5%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. PROJECT TITLE AND LOCATION: MOTCO WHARF 2 CRANE ENGINEERING REVIEW AND GUIDANCE, CONCORD, CALIFORNIA$3.2M
    Department of the Army· Contra Costa County, CA· Construction & real property· Sep 12, 2024 – Feb 4, 2026· W9123824F0084
  2. DEMOLITION, MOORING ARRANGEMENT, MOORING AND BERTHING LOADS FROM TWO NEW WCC VESSELS ON THE STRING-OUT, DESIGN OF 410 FT OF STRING-OUT. THE STRING-OUT ARRANGEMENT WILL USE THE NEW DESIGN OF THE EEY STRING-OUT PILECLUSTERS AND MODULAR FLOATS.$1.1M
    Department of the Army· Shelby County, TN· Construction & real property· Mar 10, 2026 – Mar 10, 2026· W912EQ26FA027
  3. B3852 STRUCTURAL REPAIRS CONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICES.$32K
    Department of the Army· Charleston County, SC· Construction & real property· Oct 30, 2025 – Oct 30, 2025· W912HP26FA003

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $554.4K (1 subaward)

1 sub-recipient

  1. TUV RHEINLAND CHILE S.A$554.4K100%
    SANTIAGO, CHL · 1 subaward

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

Its reported sub-contracts equal 44% of its FY2026 contract obligations.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $324.5K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2024: $174.8K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2025: $1.4M paid out · $0 received
  • FY2026: $554.4K paid out · $0 received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

8 companies · $3M reported

  1. LIFTECH CONSULTANTS INC.$1.4M
    OAKLAND, CA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. TUV RHEINLAND CHILE S.A$554.4K
    SANTIAGO, CHL · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. UES PROFESSIONAL SOLUTIONS 25, LLC$324.5K
    SAINT LOUIS, MO · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Primes that pay it

10 companies · $8.6M reported

  1. WSM PACIFIC SIOP, A JOINT VENTURE$5.5M
    HONOLULU, HI · 4 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. BURNS & MCDONNELL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.$1.2M
    KANSAS CITY, MO · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. STANTEC CONSULTING SERVICES INC.$800K
    DENVER, CO · 5 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SSFM-COFFMAN LLC$4.3M+236% in FY2026
    HONOLULU, HI · 99.9% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. ACT SERVICES LLC$4.3M+46% in FY2026
    COLUMBIA, MD · 2 entities · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. BUCHART HORN CARDNO JOINT VENTURE$4.4M−98% in FY2026
    YORK, PA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.