Federal contractor · TERRETON, ID

MUD LAKE OIL INC

No contract obligations recorded for MUD LAKE OIL INC in FY2026. Since FY2017: $17.1M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
LGMDA8NYH8J8
Small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.7MFY2017
  2. 1.6MFY2018
  3. 1.8MFY2019
  4. 1.6MFY2020
  5. 2.7MFY2021
  6. 3.7MFY2022
  7. 3.8MFY2023
  8. 119.6KFY2024

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for MUD LAKE OIL INC in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Exclusions in SAM.gov

Records of the SAM.gov exclusions list (parties debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment or otherwise excluded) matched to this recipient by its Unique Entity ID or CAGE code.

Awards during an exclusion
$53.5K
2 awards · 2 actions
Other actions during one
$0
0 awards · 0 actions
  • Debarred or declared ineligible
    No longer listed since Sep 29, 2026
    Excluding agency
    USDA
    In effect from
    Jun 3, 2024 – Aug 28, 2026
    Program
    Reciprocal
    Matched by
    Unique Entity ID
    SAM.gov record

Awards with actions during an exclusion

  1. MUD LAKE OIL INC NMSNF000091 E421202SB24M0689 · Forest Service · New award$37.1KJun 9, 2024
  2. MUD LAKE OIL INC NMLNF000227 E491202SB24M0646 · Forest Service · New award$16.5KJun 6, 2024

SAM.gov lists what agencies report, and only exclusions in effect: those that ended are known from twice-yearly snapshots, so an end date is approximate. Agencies may award to an excluded party with a documented compelling reason. An exclusion is an administrative measure, not a conviction.

Source: Exclusions (debarred, suspended and otherwise excluded parties) (U.S. General Services Administration, SAM.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Exclusions as listed on Oct 8, 2026, history from Apr 28, 2022.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. JMT CORP$138.1K
    SPANGLE, WA · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Petroleum and coal products manufacturing
  2. LINDA MAY AKERS$143.1K+479% in FY2026
    RICHLAND, OR · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Petroleum and coal products manufacturing
  3. KEMP JET SERVICES LLC$97.9K
    OGDEN, UT · 82% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveForest Service · Petroleum and coal products manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.