Federal contractor · LANSING, MI

MVL USA INC

MVL USA INC received $15.7M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 15 awards (+14% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $332.9M. Its largest customer was Department of the Navy ($11.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$15.7M
New awards
15
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
SVQFXR2M5HD5
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 39.3MFY2019
  2. 2.8MFY2020
  3. 37.8MFY2021
  4. 14.4MFY2022
  5. 82.8MFY2023
  6. 126.5MFY2024
  7. 13.8MFY2025
  8. 15.7MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 14 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Construction & real property$15.7M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$14.3M91%
  2. United States$489.2K3.1%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Department of the Army· Construction & real property· Aug 22, 2024 – Feb 23, 2026· W9128A24C0012
  2. Department of the Army· Ingham County, MI· Construction & real property· Sep 27, 2024 – Apr 20, 2026· W912DY24F0565
  3. Department of the Navy· Construction & real property· May 18, 2026 – Jun 1, 2026· N4008426F4299
  4. Department of the Army· Construction & real property· Feb 12, 2025 – Jun 8, 2026· W912ER25F0042
  5. Department of the Army· Pierce County, WA· Construction & real property· Apr 26, 2023 – Oct 23, 2025· W912DY23F0100
  6. Department of the Army· Construction & real property· Mar 28, 2025 – Mar 19, 2026· W912ER25F0070
  7. Department of the Army· Construction & real property· Apr 3, 2025 – Jun 1, 2026· W912ER25F0071
  8. Department of the Army· Construction & real property· Sep 22, 2024 – Jan 20, 2026· W5J9JE24F0016

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 8 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. FUKUOKA CITY, JPN · 90% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  2. NAHA CITY, JPN · 91% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building construction
  3. L.S. BLACK CONSTRUCTORS, LLC$130M+33% in FY2026
    SAINT PAUL, MN · 79% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Nonresidential building constructionNavy · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.