Federal contractor · CENTERBROOK, CT

NALAS ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC

NALAS ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC received $1.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 3 awards (+197% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $15.2M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($1.7M).

Obligations · FY2026
$1.8M
New awards
3
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
97%
UEI
PYMEMM1KGKY1
Parent company
NALAS ENGINEERING SERVICES INC
Small businessWoman-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2MFY2017
  2. 1.8MFY2018
  3. 2.3MFY2019
  4. 1.9MFY2020
  5. 1.6MFY2021
  6. 611.4KFY2022
  7. 1.9MFY2023
  8. 797.8KFY2024
  9. 592.3KFY2025
  10. 1.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Defense Logistics Agency$1.7M97%
    1 awards
  2. Department of the Army$60.1K3.4%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Research & development$1.8M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region, CT$1.8M100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition97%
    US 39% · $1.7M
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions97%
    US 8.8% · $1.7M
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND SCALE-UP FOR DOMESTIC PRODUCTION OF THE CRITICAL CHEMICAL TCB SBIR II REQUIREMENT$1.7M
    Defense Logistics Agency· Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region, CT· Research & development· Apr 10, 2026 – Apr 10, 2026· SP470126C0068
  2. PHASE II STT CONTRACT TITLED: "VAT POLYMERIZATION MATERIALS FOR AM OF GUN PROPELLANTS".$1.1M
    Department of the Army· Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region, CT· Research & development· Jul 23, 2024 – May 28, 2026· W15QKN24C0045
  3. SERDP WP24-4366, NEW START PRODUCTION OF TRICHLOROBENZENE (TCB) WITH LOW ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT$310.1K
    Department of the Army· Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region, CT· Research & development· Jan 4, 2024 – Nov 3, 2025· W912HQ24P0007

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

NALAS ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC received $0 in federal assistance in FY2026, on 2 actions (0 new awards), −100% vs FY2025.

Assistance · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Actions
2
Since FY2022
$3.8M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 2.1MFY2022
  2. 1.6MFY2024
  3. 125KFY2025
  4. 0FY2026

Largest awards

  1. DEFENSE PRODUCTION ACT (DPA) TITLE III, CRITICAL CHEMICAL PRECURSORS FOR ENERGETIC MATERIALS$3.8M
    12.777 · Defense Production Act Title Iii (Dpa Title III)· Department of the Air Force· Cooperative agreement· Mar 9, 2022 – Apr 15, 2026· FA86502225504

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2022–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $1.8M (2 subawards)

2 primes

  1. ALLIANT TECHSYSTEMS OPERATIONS LLC$1.6M91%
    MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 1 subaward
  2. PANTEXAS DETERRENCE, LLC$156K8.9%
    LYNCHBURG, VA · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $1.9M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $560K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $730K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $1.1M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $2.1M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $1.8M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

5 companies · $8.1M reported

  1. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION$3.3M
    MELBOURNE, FL · 2 subawards · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
  2. CONSOLIDATED NUCLEAR SECURITY, LLC$2.4M
    FREDERICK, MD · 5 subawards · Facilities support services
  3. BATTELLE ENERGY ALLIANCE, LLC$1.8M
    IDAHO FALLS, ID · 1 subaward · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. TYFAST ENERGY CORP.$3.8M+1,046% in FY2026
    SAN DIEGO, CA · 89% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Scientific research and development servicesDefense Logistics Agency · Scientific research and development services
  2. GRAPHENIX DEVELOPMENT, INC$4.8M−100% in FY2026
    WILLIAMSVILLE, NY · 97% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services
  3. AMERICAN ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY$5.6M−59% in FY2026
    GLENVIEW, IL · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Scientific research and development servicesArmy · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • Nalas EngineeringAI match · 91%
Lobbying · 2025
$60K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$180K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$40K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$40K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$60K
    4 reports
  4. 2026$40K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense14 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES14 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE14 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Strategic Marketing Innovations$180K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.