Federal contractor · FARGO, ND

NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL GENOTYPING CENTER INC

No contract obligations recorded for NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL GENOTYPING CENTER INC in FY2026. Since FY2024: $55.3K. Its largest customer was Bureau of Land Management ($0). It also received $25.5K in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
X42LFGG3QHZ6
Other than small businessNonprofit

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 10KFY2024
  2. 45.3KFY2025
  3. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Bureau of Land Management· Cass County, ND· Facilities & utilities· Jul 1, 2025 – Mar 13, 2026· 140L3725F0210

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL GENOTYPING CENTER INC received $25.5K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 1 actions (1 new awards). Its largest program was 10.031 · Plant Pest and Disease Management (PPDM) ($25.5K).

Assistance · FY2026
$25.5K
New awards
1
Actions
1
Since FY2022
$2.4M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 990.2KFY2022
  2. 856.7KFY2023
  3. 575KFY2024
  4. 25.5KFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$25.5K100%

Top programs

  1. 10.031 · Plant Pest and Disease Management (PPDM)$25.5K100%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Agriculture

Largest awards

  1. 10.031 · Plant Pest and Disease Management (PPDM)· Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service· Cooperative agreement· Jul 15, 2026 – Jul 15, 2026· AP26PPQS&T00C142

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2022–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $183.3K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. BISMARCK, ND · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $496.6K received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $417.6K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $440.9K received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $593.7K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $412.6K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $183.3K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $2.5M reported

  1. BISMARCK, ND · 12 subawards

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. HOBBS, NM · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  2. PALMER, AK · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. PHOENIX, AZ · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.