Federal contractor · MINNEAPOLIS, MN

NATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAM

NATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAM received $27.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (+6.9% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $242.3M. Its largest customer was Health Resources and Services Administration ($26.1M). It also received $1.2M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$27.8M
New awards
7
Sole-source
5.9%
Single offer
94%
UEI
FR89NXNNSDX3
Other than small businessNonprofit

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 15.8MFY2017
  2. 18.4MFY2018
  3. 18.3MFY2019
  4. 26.6MFY2020
  5. 30.1MFY2021
  6. 26.2MFY2022
  7. 26.7MFY2023
  8. 26.4MFY2024
  9. 26MFY2025
  10. 27.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 2 awards
  2. 4 awards
  3. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$23.8M85%
  2. Health & medical$4M15%

Where the work was performed

  1. Bexar County, TX$263.7K0.9%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $27.8M
  • Sole-source awards5.9%
    US 30% · $1.7M
  • Single-offer competitions94%
    US 8.8% · $26.1M
  • Urgency justifications0.9%
    US 5.1% · $263.7K

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs · 1 awards
  2. Department of Defense · 1 awards

Largest awards

  1. Health Resources and Services Administration· Montgomery County, MD· Professional services· Sep 29, 2022 – Sep 29, 2026· 75R60222C00008
  2. Health Resources and Services Administration· Montgomery County, MD· Health & medical· Sep 28, 2022 – Sep 2, 2026· 75R60222C00009
  3. Department of Veterans Affairs· Davidson County, TN· Health & medical· Apr 15, 2026 – Apr 15, 2026· 36C24926P0132
  4. Department of Veterans Affairs· Davidson County, TN· Professional services· Apr 24, 2025 – Jun 12, 2026· 36C24925P0275
  5. Department of Veterans Affairs· Hennepin County, MN· Health & medical· Sep 16, 2025 – Aug 28, 2026· 36C26025P1284
  6. Department of the Army· Bexar County, TX· Health & medical· Apr 7, 2026 – Apr 7, 2026· W81K0026PA031
  7. Department of Veterans Affairs· Hennepin County, MN· Health & medical· Sep 10, 2024 – Dec 10, 2025· 36C26024P1164

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

NATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAM received $1.2M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 4 actions (0 new awards), −70% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 93.855 · Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research ($1.1M).

Assistance · FY2026
$1.2M
New awards
0
Actions
4
Since FY2021
$64M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 16.5MFY2021
  2. 0FY2022
  3. 18MFY2023
  4. 24.1MFY2024
  5. 4.1MFY2025
  6. 1.2MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$1.2M100%

Top programs

  1. 93.855 · Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research$1.1M87%
  2. 93.837 · Cardiovascular Diseases Research$164.4K13%
  3. 12.300 · Basic and Applied Scientific Research-$0.020.0%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of Health and Human Services

Largest awards

  1. 12.300 · Basic and Applied Scientific Research· Department of the Navy· Project grant· Dec 1, 2023 – Mar 4, 2026· N000142412057
  2. 93.855 · Allergy and Infectious Diseases Research· National Institutes of Health· Cooperative agreement· Aug 13, 2024 – Aug 27, 2026· U01AI184132
  3. 93.837 · Cardiovascular Diseases Research· National Institutes of Health· Cooperative agreement· Aug 14, 2024 – Jul 22, 2026· UG1HL174426

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-contracts: $3.3M (1 subaward)
  • Sub-grants: $340K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. MILWAUKEE, WI · 2 subawards

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $0 paid out · $7M received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $9.7M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $7.5M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $8.3M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $7.2M received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $3.7M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

8 companies · $43.4M reported

  1. MILWAUKEE, WI · 26 subawards · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. LOS ANGELES, CA · 5 subawards
  3. SAN FRANCISCO, CA · 5 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MILWAUKEE, WI · 2 entities · 23% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveHealth Resources and Services Administration · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. WASHINGTON, DC · 15% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveHealth Resources and Services Administration · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  3. BLOODWORKS$17.5M+4.6% in FY2026
    SEATTLE, WA · 7.0% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveVeterans Affairs · Other ambulatory health care servicesArmy · Other ambulatory health care services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • NATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAMAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$1.1M
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$3.4M
$3.4M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$760K
    8 reports
  2. 2024$920K
    4 reports
  3. 2025$1.1M
    4 reports
  4. 2026$620K
    2 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations18 reports
  2. Health issues18 reports
  3. Labor issues, antitrust and workplace13 reports
  4. Transportation9 reports
  5. Defense4 reports
  6. Homeland security4 reports
  7. Consumer issues, safety and products2 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES18 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE18 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Van Scoyoc Associates$430K
    4 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.