Federal contractor · ARLINGTON, VA

NATURESERVE

NATURESERVE received $16.5K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−98% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $3.7M. Its largest customer was U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ($16.5K). It also received $470.4K in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$16.5K
New awards
2
Sole-source
100%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
D6APGYJ4HLF9
Parent company
NATURESERVE
Other than small businessNonprofit

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 69.3KFY2017
  2. 566KFY2018
  3. 521.4KFY2019
  4. -1.5KFY2020
  5. 139.3KFY2021
  6. 275KFY2022
  7. 1.1MFY2023
  8. 164KFY2024
  9. 769.8KFY2025
  10. 16.5KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards
  2. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. IT & telecom$16.5K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $16.5K
  • Sole-source awards100%
    US 30% · $16.5K
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration· District of Columbia, DC· IT & telecom· Sep 28, 2023 – Mar 19, 2026· 693JK323C00017
  2. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service· Fairfax County, VA· IT & telecom· Aug 29, 2025 – Jul 31, 2026· 140F1S25P0041

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

NATURESERVE received $470.4K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 6 actions (0 new awards), −72% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 15.245 · Plant Conservation and Restoration Management ($350K).

Assistance · FY2026
$470.4K
New awards
0
Actions
6
Since FY2021
$11.4M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 1.9MFY2021
  2. 1.9MFY2022
  3. 4.1MFY2023
  4. 1.5MFY2024
  5. 1.7MFY2025
  6. 470.4KFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$472.3K100%
  2. Other assistance-$1,9250.0%

Top programs

  1. 15.245 · Plant Conservation and Restoration Management$350K74%
  2. 15.945 · Cooperative Research and Training Programs – Resources of the National Park System$122.3K26%
  3. 10.707 · Research Joint Venture Agreement-$1,9250.0%

Awarding agencies

  1. Department of the Interior
  2. Department of the Interior

Largest awards

  1. 15.245 · Plant Conservation and Restoration Management· Bureau of Land Management· Cooperative agreement· Jul 27, 2023 – Sep 22, 2026· L23AC00367
  2. 15.945 · Cooperative Research and Training Programs – Resources of the National Park System· National Park Service· Cooperative agreement· Dec 20, 2024 – Mar 12, 2026· P25AC00199
  3. 10.707 · Research Joint Venture Agreement· Forest Service· Other financial assistance· May 21, 2021 – Mar 19, 2026· 20JV11221638155
  4. 15.945 · Cooperative Research and Training Programs – Resources of the National Park System· National Park Service· Cooperative agreement· Jul 12, 2021 – May 5, 2026· P20AC00666
  5. 15.945 · Cooperative Research and Training Programs – Resources of the National Park System· National Park Service· Cooperative agreement· Aug 25, 2025 – Sep 18, 2026· P25AC01751

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2021: $140.3K paid out · $0 received
  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $117.6K received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $53.1K received
  • FY2025: $50K paid out · $186.4K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

3 companies · $190.3K reported

  1. ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 1 subaward
  2. CHESAPEAKE CONSERVANCY, INC.$60K
    ANNAPOLIS, MD · 1 subaward
  3. CHAPEL HILL, NC · 1 subaward

Primes that pay it

3 companies · $357.1K reported

  1. MADISON, WI · 1 subaward
  2. NORMAN, OK · 2 subawards
  3. CABOT, VT · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BOISE, ID · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. GRAND RIVER ARCHAEOLOGICAL INC$504.6K−59% in FY2026
    GRAND JUNCTION, CO · 34% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. ZEIGLER GEOLOGIC CONSULTING$259.8K−100% in FY2026
    ALBUQUERQUE, NM · 27% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveBureau of Land Management · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • NatureServeAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2023
$60K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$100K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$60K
    4 reports
  2. 2026$40K
    1 reports

Top issues

  1. Natural resources5 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES5 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE5 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Cassidy & Associates, Inc.$60K
    4 reports
  2. Capitol Counsel LLC$40K
    1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 5, 2026, loaded Oct 5, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: AI name judgments (entity-match@1, jev-1.13.0), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026.