Federal contractor · CHICAGO, IL

NAVTEQ CORPORATION

No contract obligations recorded for NAVTEQ CORPORATION in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
NF8LN4SMLE18
Small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION company family: 3 registered entities, -$36.1K in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATIONMURRAY HILL, NJ · Family page
    -$36.1K
  2. $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. -8.5KFY2017

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for NAVTEQ CORPORATION in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

11 companies · $12.3M reported

  1. MCLEAN, VA · 11 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. RESTON, VA · 1 subaward · Architectural, engineering, and related services
  3. MINNEAPOLIS, MN · 1 subaward

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. GAINESVILLE, FL · 4.6% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services
  2. TEMPE, AZ · 4.6% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services
  3. CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA · 4.6% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Aeronautics and Space Administration · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Across the company family of NOKIA OF AMERICA CORPORATION (3 recipients).

Matched organizations

  • Nokia of America CorporationAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$680K
20 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$2.7M
$2.7M in its own reports

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$900K
    20 reports
  2. 2024$705K
    20 reports
  3. 2025$680K
    20 reports
  4. 2026$370K
    10 reports

Top issues

  1. Telecommunications56 reports
  2. Homeland security36 reports
  3. Intelligence and surveillance28 reports
  4. Science and technology28 reports
  5. Trade (domestic and foreign)28 reports
  6. Copyright, patent and trademark12 reports
  7. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code10 reports
  8. Defense9 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES67 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE67 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Navigators Global LLC (Formerly DC Navigators, LLC)$700K
    14 reports
  2. TwinLogic Strategies, LLP$700K
    14 reports
  3. ALSTON & BIRD LLP$370K
    14 reports
  4. Winn Strategies, LLC$0
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.