Federal contractor · SHEBOYGAN, WI

NEMSCHOFF, INC.

No contract obligations recorded for NEMSCHOFF, INC. in FY2026. Since FY2017: $199.8K.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
YUVZAP55KMM3
Parent company
MILLERKNOLL INC
Other than small business

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the MILLERKNOLL INC company family: 7 registered entities, $2.9M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. MILLERKNOLL INCZEELAND, MI · Family page
    $2.9M
  2. $13.8K
  3. $0
  4. $0
  5. PK SPECTRUM, LLCPHOENIXVILLE, PA
    $0

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 64.4KFY2017
  2. 75.6KFY2018
  3. 29.7KFY2019
  4. 16.7KFY2020
  5. 13.5KFY2022

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for NEMSCHOFF, INC. in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

7 companies · $963.2K reported

  1. CHANTILLY, VA · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services
  2. CHANTILLY, VA · 1 subaward
  3. MCLEAN, VA · 3 subawards · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 35 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. LEOMINSTER, MA · 3 entities · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Office furniture (including fixtures) manufacturingNavy · Office furniture (including fixtures) manufacturingAir Force · Office furniture (including fixtures) manufacturing+1 more
  2. TRADE PRODUCTS CORP.$18.3M−69% in FY2026
    FAIRFAX, VA · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Office furniture (including fixtures) manufacturingAir Force · Office furniture (including fixtures) manufacturingNavy · Office furniture (including fixtures) manufacturing
  3. OFFICEIMAGES INC$16.6M−44% in FY2026
    ROSWELL, GA · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Office furniture (including fixtures) manufacturingAir Force · Office furniture (including fixtures) manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.