Federal contractor · AUSTIN, TX

NETRISE INC

NETRISE INC received $174.3K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−94% vs FY2025). Since FY2024: $6.3M. Its largest customer was U.S. Special Operations Command ($174.3K).

Obligations · FY2026: $174.3K
New awards: 1
Sole-source: 0.0%
Single offer: 0.0%

UEI: UVU3JGMU34N1

Small business

Open in the contracts explorer Relationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

3.1MFY2024
3MFY2025
174.3KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

U.S. Special Operations Command$174.3K100%
1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Research & development$174.3K100%

Where the work was performed

Travis County, TX$174.3K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Low competition0.0%
US 39% · $0
Sole-source awards0.0%
US 30% · $0
Single-offer competitions0.0%
US 8.8% · $0
Urgency justifications0.0%
US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

PEO SOF WARRIOR - SECURE AND PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE THROUGH CYBER-THREAT EMULATION (SPICE) OPEN TOPIC$174.3K
U.S. Special Operations Command· Travis County, TX· Research & development· Dec 16, 2025 – Dec 16, 2025· H9240526PE005

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

410 MEDICAL, INC.$3.2M
RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NC · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
CALHOUN ANALYTICS, LLC$3.2M−86% in FY2026
BEAVERCREEK TOWNSHIP, OH · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
ENDEAVOR COMPOSITES, INC.$3.3M−93% in FY2026
KNOXVILLE, TN · 50% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

NetRise, Inc.AI match · 100%

Lobbying · 2025: $200K; 4 reports
Lobbying · 2024–2026: $380K

Lobbying by year

2024$20K
1 reports
2025$200K
4 reports
2026$160K
3 reports

Top issues

Budget and appropriations8 reports
Defense1 reports
Homeland security1 reports
Science and technology1 reports

Who was contacted

U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES8 reports
U.S. SENATE8 reports
Homeland Security - Dept of (DHS)5 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

Venture Government Strategies, LLC (fka Hobart Hallaway & Quayle Ventures, LLC)$320K
7 reports
HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP$60K
1 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Congress: members and bills

Through the organizations matched to this company: members of Congress whose campaigns received contributions from their PACs, and the bills their lobbying reports named. Shown beside the company's contracts as a comparison, not a cause.

Bills named in its lobbying reports

H.R. 4213 · Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 20264 reports
119th Congress · Introduced · 2025–2026
H.R. 3838 · Streamlining Procurement for Effective Execution and Delivery and National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 20262 reports
119th Congress · Passed one chamber · 2025
H.R. 9310 · Department of Homeland Security Appropriations Act, 20272 reports
119th Congress · Introduced · 2026
S. 2296 · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 20262 reports
119th Congress · Passed one chamber · 2025
H.R. 8800 · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 20271 report
119th Congress · Passed one chamber · 2026
S. 4784 · National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 20271 report
119th Congress · Reported by committee · 2026

6 of 8 reports (2024–2026) name at least one bill. Bills and resolutions the current reports name in their issue descriptions, by number of reports. A report names what it lobbied on, not which side it took.

Amounts, members and bills are as recorded, shown side by side. They say nothing about why a contribution was made, how a member voted or what a report sought. A bill number written in a report is read as the measure of the Congress its context points to (a law's number, the Congress written next to it, the title), else of the Congress then sitting.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.