Federal contractor · NEW YORK, NY

NEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC

NEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC received -$362K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 1 awards (−197% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $7.8M. Its largest customer was National Institutes of Health (-$362K).

Obligations · FY2026
-$362K
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
ZCKCL8KFL3B9
Other than small businessNonprofit
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 34KFY2017
  2. 1.5MFY2018
  3. 488.1KFY2019
  4. 909KFY2020
  5. 1.1MFY2021
  6. 2.4MFY2022
  7. 879.8KFY2023
  8. 429.7KFY2024
  9. 371.3KFY2025
  10. -362KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. National Institutes of Health-$362K0.0%
    1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. IPSC GENERATION AND BETA CELL DIFFERENTIATION$0
    National Institutes of Health· Montgomery County, MD· Health & medical· Sep 23, 2025 – Feb 12, 2026· 75N92025P00392

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

NEW YORK STEM CELL FOUNDATION INC received -$32.1K in federal assistance in FY2026, on 1 actions (0 new awards). Its largest program was 93.866 · Aging Research (-$32.1K).

Assistance · FY2026
-$32.1K
New awards
0
Actions
1
Since FY2021
$1.9M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 1.1MFY2021
  2. 876.8KFY2022
  3. -11FY2023
  4. 0FY2024
  5. -32.1KFY2026

By type

  1. Grants-$32.1K0.0%

Top programs

  1. 93.866 · Aging Research-$32.1K0.0%

Largest awards

  1. USE OF IPSC SYSTEMS TO DEFINE ROLES OF MICROGLIAL TREM2/DAP12 AND CR3/DAP12 COMPLEXES AND THEIR GENETIC VARIANTS IN SPECIFYING RISK FOR…$4.1M
    93.866 · Aging Research· National Institutes of Health· Project grant· Apr 29, 2021 – Apr 7, 2026· R01AG061894

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2021–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: -$75.1K (1 subaward)

1 prime

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $895.6K received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $899.2K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · -$75.1K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $1.8M reported

  1. BRIGHAM & WOMENS HOSPITAL INC$899.2K
    BOSTON, MA · 2 subawards
  2. ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI$895.6K
    NEW YORK, NY · 1 subaward

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CYRACOM INTERNATIONAL, INC$402.9K+98% in FY2026
    TUCSON, AZ · 2 entities · 87% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  2. DEUTSCHES KREBSFORSCHUNGSZENTRUM$507K
    HEIDELBERG, DEU · 96% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Other professional, scientific, and technical services
  3. PEARSON PHARMA PARTNERS$350.7K+79% in FY2026
    WESTLAKE VILLAGE, CA · 80% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveNational Institutes of Health · Other professional, scientific, and technical services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • New York Stem Cell FoundationAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$120K
4 reports
Lobbying · 2024–2025
$320K

Lobbying by year

  1. 2024$200K
    4 reports
  2. 2025$120K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Budget and appropriations7 reports
  2. Health issues7 reports

Who was contacted

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. Manatt, Phelps, and Phillips$320K
    8 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Oct 5, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 10, 2026, loaded Oct 10, 2026.