Federal contractor · YUMA, AZ
NICKLAUS ENGINEERING, INC.
NICKLAUS ENGINEERING, INC. received $286.8K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−69% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $46.4M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($286.8K).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $286.8K
- New awards
- 2
- Sole-source
- 100%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- TGHENAFPMZ13
Company family
Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.
2 registered entities of the same company or corporate group, $286.8K in FY2026 together.
- NICKLAUS ENGINEERING, INC.YUMA, AZ · Family page$286.8K
- NICKLAUS ENGINEERING INCORO VALLEY, AZ$0
AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-09-30
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 3.3MFY2017
- 3.7MFY2018
- 11.2MFY2019
- 9.3MFY2020
- 5MFY2021
- 3.4MFY2022
- 2.3MFY2023
- 7.1MFY2024
- 924.9KFY2025
- 286.8KFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Department of the Army$286.8K100%2 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Facilities & utilities$286.8K100%
Where the work was performed
- Yuma County, AZ$286.8K100%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition100%US 39% · $286.8K
- Sole-source awards100%US 30% · $286.8K
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.8% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Agencies awarding it sole-source contracts
- Department of the Army$286.8KDepartment of Defense · 1 awards
Largest awards
- YEAR ONE$304.5KDepartment of the Army· Yuma County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Oct 23, 2024 – Nov 20, 2025· W9124R25F0001
- Department of the Army· Yuma County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Oct 31, 2025 – Jun 3, 2026· W9124R26FA004
Subawards
Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.
As a prime: who it pays · FY2026
No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.
As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026
No subawards reported to it in FY2026.
By fiscal year
- FY2022: $0 paid out · $106.1K received
- FY2023: $0 paid out · $628K received
- FY2024: $0 paid out · $800.1K received
- FY2025: $0 paid out · $795.9K received
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.
Teaming partners
Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.
Companies it pays
No subawards reported to other companies.
Primes that pay it
3 companies · $2.3M reported
- LEIDOS, INC.$1.9MRESTON, VA · 4 subawards
- PASCAGOULA, MS · 3 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- SAN DIEGO, CA · 2 subawards · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.
Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 3, 2026, loaded Oct 3, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- JACOBS AND ARCHITECTS HAWAII JOINT VENTURE$5.4M−100% in FY2026HONOLULU, HI · 55% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesAir Force · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- CIBOLA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC.$5.3M−11% in FY2026YUMA, AZ · 54% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
- DEWBERRY-GF USACE NAN RIVERINE JV PARTNERS$5.4M−100% in FY2026FAIRFAX, VA · 54% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services
Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 6, 2026, loaded Oct 6, 2026.