Federal contractor · YAMATO
NIPPI CORPORATION
NIPPI CORPORATION received $13.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 96 awards (+25% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $119.4M. Its largest customer was Defense Contract Management Agency ($13.8M).
- Obligations · FY2026
- $13.8M
- New awards
- 96
- Sole-source
- 0.0%
- Single offer
- 0.0%
- UEI
- ZDGMM58ECYM5
Spending by fiscal year
Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).
- 7.3MFY2017
- 9MFY2018
- 10.1MFY2019
- 10.5MFY2020
- 13.9MFY2021
- 19.2MFY2022
- 15MFY2023
- 9.5MFY2024
- 11MFY2025
- 13.8MFY2026
Top buying agencies
Obligations in FY2026.
- Defense Contract Management Agency$13.8M100%96 awards
What was bought · Where the work was performed
Obligations in FY2026.
What was bought
- Equipment maintenance$13.8M100%
Where the work was performed
- Abroad$13.8M100%
Integrity signals
Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.
- Low competition0.0%US 39% · $0
- Sole-source awards0.0%US 30% · $0
- Single-offer competitions0.0%US 8.7% · $0
- Urgency justifications0.0%US 5.1% · $0
A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.
Largest awards
- Defense Contract Management Agency· Equipment maintenance· Nov 20, 2025 – Feb 25, 2026· SJP10A26F0002
- Defense Contract Management Agency· Equipment maintenance· Mar 11, 2026 – Apr 28, 2026· SJP10A26F0052
- Defense Contract Management Agency· Equipment maintenance· Feb 3, 2025 – Mar 25, 2026· SJP10A25F0026
- Defense Contract Management Agency· Equipment maintenance· Jun 12, 2024 – Oct 21, 2025· SJP10A24F0079
- H-60 PMI$820.6KDefense Contract Management Agency· Equipment maintenance· Dec 1, 2025 – Apr 13, 2026· SJP10A26F0005
- H-60 PMI$780.3KDefense Contract Management Agency· Equipment maintenance· Mar 12, 2026 – Apr 16, 2026· SJP10A26F0051
- H-60 PMI$720.3KDefense Contract Management Agency· Equipment maintenance· May 28, 2026 – Jun 8, 2026· SJP10A26F0063
- H-60 PMI$680K
Competitors
Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.
Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.
- MARSHALL OF CAMBRIDGE AEROSPACE LIMITED$98.8M−10% in FY2026CAMBRIDGE, GBR · 2 entities · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Contract Management Agency · Support activities for air transportation
- SUBARU CORPORATION$10.5M−153% in FY2026SHIBUYA-KU, JPN · 31% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Contract Management Agency · Support activities for air transportation
- KOREAN AIR LINES CO.,LTD.$112.9M−25% in FY2026SEOUL, KOR · 2 entities · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Contract Management Agency · Support activities for air transportation
Showing the top 3 of 14 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.
Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.
Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.