Federal contractor · MINNEAPOLIS, MN

NIRON MAGNETICS INC

No contract obligations recorded for NIRON MAGNETICS INC in FY2026. Since FY2021: $14.3M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($0). It also received $2.5M in federal grants and other assistance in FY2026.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
1
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
MH5DWJN9K8T9
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.8MFY2021
  2. 0FY2022
  3. 12.5MFY2023
  4. 64.1KFY2024
  5. -3.3KFY2025
  6. 0FY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 1 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Logistics Agency· Hennepin County, MN· Research & development· Jan 11, 2023 – Oct 27, 2025· SP470123C0005

Federal grants & assistance received

Grants, loans (counted at their subsidy cost), direct payments and insurance, by fiscal year of the action (USAspending.gov, FABS). Reported apart from contracts and never added to them.

NIRON MAGNETICS INC received $2.5M in federal assistance in FY2026, on 2 actions (0 new awards), +6.4% vs FY2025. Its largest program was 81.135 · Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy ($2.5M).

Assistance · FY2026
$2.5M
New awards
0
Actions
2
Since FY2023
$22.3M

Assistance by fiscal year

  1. 17.5MFY2023
  2. 0FY2024
  3. 2.3MFY2025
  4. 2.5MFY2026

By type

  1. Grants$2.5M100%

Top programs

  1. 81.135 · Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy$2.5M100%

Awarding agencies

Largest awards

  1. 81.135 · Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy· Department of Energy· Cooperative agreement· Feb 17, 2023 – Oct 30, 2025· DEAR0001681
  2. 81.086 · Conservation Research and Development· Department of Energy· Cooperative agreement· Sep 29, 2025 – May 27, 2026· DEEE0011722

Source: Federal financial assistance transactions (Financial Assistance Broker Submission) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · FY2023–FY2026.

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

  • Sub-grants: $389.9K (1 subaward)

1 prime

  1. MILWAUKEE, WI · 1 subaward

By fiscal year

  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $282.1K received
  • FY2026: $0 paid out · $389.9K received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

No subawards reported to other companies.

Primes that pay it

1 company · $672K reported

  1. MILWAUKEE, WI · 2 subawards

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. COLORADO SPRINGS, CO · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  2. LAFAYETTE, CO · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services
  3. REM CHEMICALS, INC.$98.5K−83% in FY2026
    SOUTHINGTON, CT · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Scientific research and development services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Lobbying and PAC activity

Organizations in House lobbying disclosures and FEC records whose names an AI judgment matched to this company. Those records carry no identifier shared with contracts, so every match is by name.

Matched organizations

  • NIRON MAGNETICS INCAI match · 100%
Lobbying · 2025
$320K
8 reports
Lobbying · 2023–2026
$880K
$520K in its own reports
PAC giving · 2026
$78.6K
1 PAC

Lobbying by year

  1. 2023$240K
    4 reports
  2. 2024$120K
    7 reports
  3. 2025$320K
    8 reports
  4. 2026$200K
    4 reports

Top issues

  1. Defense15 reports
  2. Taxation and the Internal Revenue Code14 reports
  3. Budget and appropriations10 reports
  4. Energy and nuclear5 reports

Who was contacted

  1. U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES20 reports
  2. U.S. SENATE19 reports

Houses of Congress and federal agencies the reports list as contacted (a report names every one for all its issues).

Lobbying firms hired

  1. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP$840K
    14 reports

Registrants who are individuals are counted, not named.

PAC giving to candidates by party, 2026 cycle

  1. Republican$43.5K55%
  2. Democratic$35.1K45%

PACs sponsored

  • NIRON MAGNETICS PAC$91.9K raised this cycle

PACs these organizations sponsor (connected organizations in FEC records). A PAC gives employees' and members' voluntary contributions, not the company's own money.

Lobbying amounts are the filers' own good-faith estimates on quarterly LD-2 reports (the law asks for amounts rounded to $10,000; under $5,000 need not be itemized), latest amendment only. When an organization files its own report, it replaces what outside firms report for it that quarter. Matches are by name. Lobbying and political giving are legal and public: they show engagement with government, not influence over any award. Correlation is not influence: these organizations' lobbying and their contracts are shown side by side, and nothing here implies either affected the other.

Source: Lobbying disclosures (LD-1 registrations, LD-2 quarterly reports, LD-203 contribution reports) (Clerk of the U.S. House of Representatives), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2023–2026.

Source: Committees, candidates and committee contributions to candidates (Federal Election Commission), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · 2026, 2024, 2022.

Matches: Analisa AI name judgments (entity-match@1), updated Sep 30, 2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.