Federal contractor · SHIBUYA-KU

NISHIKAWA KEISOKU CO., LTD.

NISHIKAWA KEISOKU CO., LTD. received $116.1K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−5.1% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $1.8M. Its largest customer was Department of the Air Force ($116.1K).

Obligations · FY2026
$116.1K
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
JYU9QQRWKKM3
Other than small business
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 220.7KFY2017
  2. 110.2KFY2018
  3. 139.2KFY2019
  4. 432.4KFY2020
  5. 157.4KFY2021
  6. 101.9KFY2022
  7. 132.2KFY2023
  8. 264.8KFY2024
  9. 122.4KFY2025
  10. 116.1KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Air Force$116.1K100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Equipment maintenance$116.1K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Abroad$116.1K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. REPLACING AND INSPECTION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR SERVICES OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING SYSTEM DEVICES AT HIROSHIMA AREA.$600.3K
    Department of the Air Force· Equipment maintenance· Oct 30, 2019 – Dec 10, 2025· FA520920P0020
  2. INSPECTION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF WATER QUALITY MONITORING SYSTEMS AT U.S. ARMY GARRISON JAPAN INSTALLATIONS IN KANTO PLAIN, JAPAN$354.8K
    Department of the Air Force· Equipment maintenance· Apr 25, 2023 – Apr 20, 2026· FA520923P0045

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 2 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SCOTT VAUGHAN$367.8K−12% in FY2026
    GREAT FALLS, MT · 73% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment repair and maintenance
  2. EASON ENTERPRISES L.L.C$361.9K
    OKLAHOMA CITY, OK · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment repair and maintenance
  3. KOZCO MECHANICAL INC$380.8K+115% in FY2026
    OGDEN, UT · 73% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Commercial and industrial machinery and equipment repair and maintenance

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.