Federal contractor · PIEDMONT, SC

NO-FADE COATINGS, INC

NO-FADE COATINGS, INC received $735K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 7 awards (+35% vs FY2025). Since FY2025: $1.3M. Its largest customer was Defense Logistics Agency ($735K).

Obligations · FY2026
$735K
New awards
7
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
100%
UEI
STBXVQWJV7V1
Other than small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 544.2KFY2025
  2. 735KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 7 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Other equipment & supplies$735K100%

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition100%
    US 39% · $735K
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions100%
    US 8.7% · $735K
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Defense Logistics Agency· Anderson County, SC· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 14, 2026 – Apr 14, 2026· SPE8E626P0826
  2. Defense Logistics Agency· Anderson County, SC· Other equipment & supplies· Apr 10, 2026 – Apr 10, 2026· SPE8E626P0816
  3. Defense Logistics Agency· Anderson County, SC· Other equipment & supplies· May 12, 2026 – May 12, 2026· SPE8E626P0907
  4. Defense Logistics Agency· Anderson County, SC· Other equipment & supplies· Nov 10, 2025 – Nov 10, 2025· SPE8E626P0255
  5. Defense Logistics Agency· Anderson County, SC· Other equipment & supplies· May 4, 2026 – May 4, 2026· SPE7M026V3474
  6. Defense Logistics Agency· Anderson County, SC· Other equipment & supplies· Dec 22, 2025 – Dec 22, 2025· SPE7M426V1590
  7. Defense Logistics Agency· Anderson County, SC· Other equipment & supplies· Dec 10, 2025 – Dec 10, 2025· SPE7M126V3581

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 3 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. SAINT LOUIS, MO · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Other general purpose machinery manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
  2. BETA FUELING SYSTEMS, LLC$1M−35% in FY2026
    REIDSVILLE, NC · 53% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Other general purpose machinery manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing
  3. C. H. BRADSHAW CO.$1.6M−16% in FY2026
    GROVE CITY, OH · 64% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveDefense Logistics Agency · Other general purpose machinery manufacturingDefense Logistics Agency · Other fabricated metal product manufacturing

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.