Federal contractor · EDMOND, OK

NORTH AMERICAN SECURITY, INCORPORATED

NORTH AMERICAN SECURITY, INCORPORATED received $10.5M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 32 awards (−67% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $303.3M. Its largest customer was Office of Procurement Operations ($10.5M).

Obligations · FY2026
$10.5M
New awards
32
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
VKKVJKSKMDS6
Small business

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 13.6MFY2017
  2. 13.6MFY2018
  3. 29MFY2019
  4. 47.8MFY2020
  5. 40.2MFY2021
  6. 37.3MFY2022
  7. 39.2MFY2023
  8. 40.5MFY2024
  9. 31.5MFY2025
  10. 10.5MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. 32 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$10.5M100%

Where the work was performed

  1. Essex County, MA$565.2K5.4%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. Office of Procurement Operations· Capitol Planning Region, CT· Facilities & utilities· Dec 3, 2024 – Feb 19, 2026· 70RFP125FRE100001
  2. Office of Procurement Operations· Warren County, MS· Facilities & utilities· Nov 29, 2021 – Sep 29, 2026· 70RFP122FRE400003
  3. Office of Procurement Operations· Prince George's County, MD· Facilities & utilities· Sep 30, 2025 – Oct 23, 2025· 70RFP225FREC00048
  4. Office of Procurement Operations· Capitol Planning Region, CT· Facilities & utilities· Sep 14, 2023 – Oct 31, 2025· 70RFP123FRE100011
  5. Office of Procurement Operations· Pulaski County, AR· Facilities & utilities· Feb 5, 2026 – May 27, 2026· 70RFP426FRE700009
  6. Office of Procurement Operations· Capitol Planning Region, CT· Facilities & utilities· Jun 14, 2024 – Nov 20, 2025· 70RFP124FRE100010
  7. Office of Procurement Operations· Shelby County, TN· Facilities & utilities· Sep 12, 2022 – Aug 31, 2026· 70RFP122FRE400023
  8. Office of Procurement Operations· Capitol Planning Region, CT· Facilities & utilities· May 16, 2025 – Feb 19, 2026· 70RFP125FRE100016

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 1 market (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. CDA INCORPORATED$89M−88% in FY2026
    ANNAPOLIS, MD · 100% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of Procurement Operations · Investigation and security services
  2. LEANDER, TX · 95% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of Procurement Operations · Investigation and security services
  3. PATRONUS SYSTEMS INC$59.6M−69% in FY2026
    MELBOURNE, FL · 72% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveOffice of Procurement Operations · Investigation and security services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.