Federal contractor · BREMERTON, WA

NORTH STAR CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING INC

No contract obligations recorded for NORTH STAR CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING INC in FY2026. Since FY2017: $2.1M.

Obligations · FY2026
$0
New awards
0
Sole-source
—
Single offer
—
UEI
LJ6HR8CCL3J3
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) program

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the NORTH STAR CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING INC company family: 2 registered entities, $5.5M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. NORTH STAR CONSTRUCTION & ENGINEERING INCYUBA CITY, CA · Family page
    $5.5M

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 104.2KFY2017
  2. 1MFY2018
  3. 984.2KFY2019
  4. 0FY2020
  5. 14.1KFY2021

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

No contract obligations recorded for NORTH STAR CONSTRUCTION AND ENGINEERING INC in FY2026.

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

Where the work was performed

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

1 company · $639.4K reported

  1. CHICAGO, IL · 1 subaward · Highway, street, and bridge construction

Primes that pay it

2 companies · $8.6M reported

  1. CONCORD, CA · 1 subaward · Nonresidential building construction
  2. SAN DIEGO, CA · 1 subaward · Other specialty trade contractors

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 7 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. BATON ROUGE, LA · 77% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building constructionNational Park Service · Nonresidential building constructionU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · Nonresidential building construction
  2. HIGHTOWER CONSTRUCTION CO INC$22.2M−58% in FY2026
    NORTH CHARLESTON, SC · 57% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building constructionAir Force · Highway, street, and bridge construction
  3. NORTH RICHLAND HILLS, TX · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveAir Force · Nonresidential building construction

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.