Federal contractor · IDAHO FALLS, ID

NORTH WIND-EA JV, LLC

NORTH WIND-EA JV, LLC received $16.6K in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 2 awards (−75% vs FY2025). Since FY2019: $18.1M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($16.6K).

Obligations · FY2026
$16.6K
New awards
2
Sole-source
0.0%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
G4K9ANDMGNK9
Parent company
COOK INLET REGION INC
Small businessMinority-ownedNative-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the OSC TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC company family: 27 registered entities, $13.5M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. OSC TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLCKNOXVILLE, TN · Family page
    -$13.3K
  2. NORTH WIND SITE SERVICES LLCMURRAY, UT
    $6.8M
  3. NORTH WIND RESOURCE CONSULTING LLCIDAHO FALLS, ID
    $2.8M
  4. NORTH WIND SITE SERVICES LLCSAN DIEGO, CA
    $1.7M
  5. NORTH WIND SITE SERVICES, LLCIDAHO FALLS, ID
    $1.4M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 2.4MFY2019
  2. 4MFY2020
  3. 7.6MFY2021
  4. 452.3KFY2022
  5. 2.4MFY2023
  6. 1.2MFY2024
  7. 67.1KFY2025
  8. 16.6KFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$16.6K100%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Facilities & utilities$16.6K100%

Where the work was performed

  1. 69$30.5K100%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition0.0%
    US 39% · $0
  • Sole-source awards0.0%
    US 30% · $0
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.8% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. THE DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE (DAF) IS PROPOSING TO DEVELOP A COMBAT SUPPORT TRAINING SITE (CSTR) AT JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON (JBER), ALASKA$540.7K
    Department of the Army· Anchorage Municipality, AK· Facilities & utilities· Jul 25, 2024 – Apr 14, 2026· W911KB24F0079
  2. TASK ORDER AWARD OF CLINS 0001-0003, AND OPTIONAL TASK 0004 ROTA EBS.$281.9K
    Department of the Army· Facilities & utilities· Sep 24, 2024 – May 14, 2026· W911KB24F0126

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

4 companies · $3.4M reported

  1. AMERICAN INTEGRATED RESOURCES INC.$2.8M
    ORANGE, CA · 1 subaward · Other specialty trade contractors
  2. GALILEO PROJECT LLC$347.3K
    TEMPE, AZ · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. THE XCAVATION CO, INC$123.6K
    KAMAS, UT · 1 subaward · Remediation and other waste management services

Primes that pay it

12 companies · $144.4M reported

  1. TRIAD NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC$50M
    COLUMBUS, OH · 1 subaward · Facilities support services
  2. FLUOR MARINE PROPULSION, LLC$43.3M
    GREENVILLE, SC · 30 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATED$41.3M
    PASCAGOULA, MS · 6 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 8, 2026, loaded Oct 8, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 24 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MSMM ENGINEERING, LLC$18.5M−100% in FY2026
    NEW ORLEANS, LA · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. CDM FEDERAL SERVICES EUROPE JOINT VENTURE$17.1M−27% in FY2026
    BICKENBACH, DEU · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. CANVAS II, LLC$19.6M−53% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 7, 2026, loaded Oct 7, 2026.