Federal contractor · MURRAY, UT

NORTH WIND SITE SERVICES LLC

NORTH WIND SITE SERVICES LLC received $6.8M in federal contract obligations in FY2026, on 6 awards (+13% vs FY2025). Since FY2017: $65.3M. Its largest customer was Department of the Army ($4.6M).

Obligations · FY2026
$6.8M
New awards
6
Sole-source
68%
Single offer
0.0%
UEI
LLKKPN8DH598
Small businessMinority-owned8(a) programNative-owned
Open in the contracts explorerRelationship graph

Company family

Grouped from reported parent companies (UEI) and, where marked, AI judgments that two records name the same organization or group.

Part of the OSC TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC company family: 27 registered entities, $13.5M in FY2026 together. See the family

  1. OSC TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLCKNOXVILLE, TN · Family page
    -$13.3K
  2. NORTH WIND RESOURCE CONSULTING LLCIDAHO FALLS, ID
    $2.8M
  3. NORTH WIND SITE SERVICES LLCSAN DIEGO, CA
    $1.7M
  4. NORTH WIND SITE SERVICES, LLCIDAHO FALLS, ID
    $1.4M
  5. NORTH WIND FEDERAL SERVICES, LLCIDAHO FALLS, ID
    $1.4M

AI-inferred: entity-match@1 · Analisa AI · 2026-10-05

Spending by fiscal year

Obligations per federal fiscal year (October–September).

  1. 1.8MFY2017
  2. 11.5MFY2018
  3. 4.5MFY2019
  4. 5.1MFY2020
  5. 5.9MFY2021
  6. 9.4MFY2022
  7. 6.6MFY2023
  8. 7.8MFY2024
  9. 6MFY2025
  10. 6.8MFY2026

Top buying agencies

Obligations in FY2026.

  1. Department of the Army$4.6M68%
    4 awards
  2. Bureau of Land Management$2.2M32%
    2 awards

What was bought · Where the work was performed

Obligations in FY2026.

What was bought

  1. Professional services$4.7M69%
  2. Construction & real property$2.2M31%

Where the work was performed

  1. Honolulu County, HI$4.6M67%
  2. Sweetwater County, WY$1.5M22%
  3. Big Horn County, MT$706.5K10%
  4. Tooele County, UT$163.6K2.4%

Integrity signals

Shares of the year's obligations, next to the country's.

  • Low competition68%
    US 39% · $4.6M
  • Sole-source awards68%
    US 30% · $4.6M
  • Single-offer competitions0.0%
    US 8.7% · $0
  • Urgency justifications0.0%
    US 5.1% · $0

A signal is a reason to look closer, not evidence of wrongdoing: most sole-source awards are lawful and justified.

Largest awards

  1. 611TH CES PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT$20.7M
    Department of the Army· Honolulu County, HI· Professional services· Jun 30, 2022 – May 11, 2026· W9128A22C0005
  2. ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION AND POLLUTION PREVENTION AT YUMA PROVING GROUND (YPG), ARIZONA (AZ NEW TASK ORDER$2M
    Department of the Army· Yuma County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Sep 25, 2021 – Jun 23, 2026· W912BV21F0139
  3. FEDERAL ORPHANED WELL PROGRAM - PLUGGING AND ABANDONMENT SERVICES IDIQ REGION 3$1.5M
    Bureau of Land Management· Sweetwater County, WY· Construction & real property· Sep 23, 2026 – Sep 23, 2026· 140L0626F0059
  4. FEDERAL ORPHANED WELL PROGRAM IDIQ | WY, SPENCE DOME P&A - GROUP 4$706.5K
    Bureau of Land Management· Big Horn County, MT· Construction & real property· Sep 24, 2026 – Sep 24, 2026· 140L0626F0065
  5. DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SUPPORT, YUMA PROVING GROUND (YPG) YUMA, ARIZONA.$639.9K
    Department of the Army· Yuma County, AZ· Facilities & utilities· Sep 28, 2022 – Dec 18, 2025· W912BV22F0174
  6. SOUTH OD COMPLIANCE SAMPLING$345.7K
    Department of the Army· Tooele County, UT· Professional services· Jun 26, 2024 – Jun 2, 2026· W519TC24C2030

Subawards

Matched by Unique Entity ID: the first-tier subawards this organization reported as a prime recipient, and those primes reported paying it.

As a prime: who it pays · FY2026

No subawards reported as a prime in FY2026.

As a sub-recipient: who pays it · FY2026

No subawards reported to it in FY2026.

By fiscal year

  • FY2022: $0 paid out · $17.7M received
  • FY2023: $0 paid out · $12.7M received
  • FY2024: $0 paid out · $9.4M received
  • FY2025: $0 paid out · $1.5M received

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from FY2021.

Teaming partners

Companies this company reported paying, primes that reported paying it, from FFATA subaward reports.

Companies it pays

4 companies · $3.4M reported

  1. AMERICAN INTEGRATED RESOURCES INC.$2.8M
    ORANGE, CA · 1 subaward · Other specialty trade contractors
  2. GALILEO PROJECT LLC$347.3K
    TEMPE, AZ · 1 subaward · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. THE XCAVATION CO, INC$123.6K
    KAMAS, UT · 1 subaward · Remediation and other waste management services

Primes that pay it

12 companies · $144.4M reported

  1. TRIAD NATIONAL SECURITY, LLC$50M
    COLUMBUS, OH · 1 subaward · Facilities support services
  2. FLUOR MARINE PROPULSION, LLC$43.3M
    GREENVILLE, SC · 30 subawards · Remediation and other waste management services
  3. HUNTINGTON INGALLS INCORPORATED$41.3M
    PASCAGOULA, MS · 6 subawards

Showing the top 3 of each list. Open the profile for potential partners and the full lists.

Primes report first-tier subawards of $30,000 or more themselves, and many go unreported (GAO-24-106214). Reporting moved from FSRS to SAM.gov in March 2025 and fewer sub-contracts have been reported since. Amounts are what primes reported; they are never added to prime award totals.

Source: Subawards (first-tier sub-contracts and sub-grants reported under FFATA) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov (reports filed in SAM.gov, formerly FSRS)), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · Subawards loaded from 2021.

Competitors

Companies that win from the same buyers in the same markets: obligations by agency and industry compared over the last three fiscal years.

Compared on 24 markets (agency × industry), FY2024–FY2026.

  1. MSMM ENGINEERING, LLC$18.5M−100% in FY2026
    NEW ORLEANS, LA · 36% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  2. CDM FEDERAL SERVICES EUROPE JOINT VENTURE$17.1M−27% in FY2026
    BICKENBACH, DEU · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related servicesArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting services
  3. CANVAS II, LLC$19.6M−53% in FY2026
    HUNTSVILLE, AL · 29% of this company's obligations are in markets they both serveArmy · Management, scientific, and technical consulting servicesArmy · Architectural, engineering, and related services

Showing the top 3 of 25 competitors. Open the profile for the full list.

Who sells to the same buyers in the same markets, not who wins against whom on a given contract. Prime contract obligations by the agency and NAICS code of each award; subawards are never added. A company is a family of legal entities, joined by parent UEI or, in part, by an AI reading of names.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026 · FY2024–FY2026.

Source: Federal contract transactions (Federal Procurement Data System) (U.S. Department of the Treasury, USAspending.gov), data current to Oct 9, 2026, loaded Oct 9, 2026.